Nations the board game is a perfect example of what I like to call board game evolution design, not to be confused with expansion or revolution, sometimes not even really innovation design. It takes a board game that is already beloved by many and applies modern, established design methods and mechanics to it, to create a new, more efficient more streamlined board game. This is often reflected in 2nd edition versions of games, for example Descent and Descent 2nd edition are clearly the result of evolution based design. Often however the original license holders never takes it upon themselves to re-invent their games, or in some cases they do but they make too many changes to call in a 2nd edition. This method of board game design we have seen quite a bit of in recent years. Some good examples are games like Agricola which evolved into Caverna, or RISK evolving into RISK legacy. There are countless examples of this and there is no question in my mind that Nations is an evolution design of Through The Ages, another Civilization building game. To write a review without comparing it to Through The Ages would be silly.

The thing about evolution design is that it’s not always a positive step forward, sometimes the newer design methods manage to create a more streamlined experience, but result is a lesser game. We are going to take a look at Nations today, compare it to Through The Ages and see how its evolutionary design fares. It’s not going to be easy, Through the Ages is a beloved game, sitting pretty on BoardGameGeeks top 10 list for a very long time and for good reason. It is a really great game, perhaps a bit niche but for lovers of complex civilization building games, Through The Ages represents the ultimate experience in the genre.

Nations is a board game of Civilization building using a variety of clever resource management, worker placement and card mechanics. There is no map, so like Through The Ages it is a very abstract experience. It’s really about who can manage their resources and respond to the dynamics of the game the best in the chase for victory points.

In Nations each player takes on the role of a Civilization during the age of Antiquity and manages It through four ages all the way to the Industrial age (roughly world war I). During the game you will purchase improvement cards for your civilization, manage your military strength, stability, heritage (think culture) and your population (your workers). You will build Wonders of The World, fight battles, conquer colonies, construct buildings and acquire great historical figures all through the heavy abstraction of card play. If that sounds familiar it’s because that is the exact same premise as Through the Ages and while many of the mechanics of the game actually differ, conceptually the two games are identical.

What’s Different
First and foremost we must note that as expected given the complexity of Through The Ages mechanics, Nations is a much simpler game, as it intends to be. One of the biggest complaints about Through The Ages is its complexity. Nations is easier to learn and teach, far easier to remember the rules and in as a whole very streamlined by comparison to the often clunky and rules heavy Through the Ages. The real question here is what is lost by this change and the simple answer is not much other than exactly what the intention of the changes are, that sometimes overwhelming complexity that Through The Ages is famous for.

I love Through The Ages don’t get me wrong but no matter how often I play it, I can never fully remember the rules and during a typical game of Through The Ages consulting the very heavy manual is so constant its really almost part of the game.

From a stand point of strategy, tactics and dynamics Nations is as infinite as it is subtle, same as Through The Ages is. If Through The Ages is difficult to learn, impossible to master, Nations is easy to learn but impossible to master. Nations manages to remove the rules complexity, without affecting that deep strategic, often mind melting experience of Civilization management that we got in Through The Ages. From this perspective alone, Nations gets an A+ in terms of achievement of its objective, which was to create a less complex version of Through The Ages.

The next big change is the addition of Asymmetrical play, now Through The Ages also had this but Nations takes it a step further by creating two key mechanics that allow for a wider variation of play. The first is that each Civilization has an A and a B side, the A sides are all the same so it allows for a game where everyone begins the game with the exact same starting conditions. While the B-side is unique to each Civilization representing a sort of historically presumed strength of that nation creating Asymmetrical play. This in itself allows a wider variation of play styles, you can have that “we all start even game” which is great, but offers that asymmetrical style if you so desire.

The other element is the dynamics of the improvement cards themselves. In Through The Ages, while the cards that come up would do so in different order, they would always all come up. This in a sense meant that while there was some dynamics, there was a fixed strategic element you could count on each game. In Nations there are far more cards available than will ever come up, so you cannot reliably align yourself to a single long term strategy, you really have to see what comes up and adapt accordingly. This does wonders for replay ability and creates different types of games where in some Military will be vital, while others stability or money will reign supreme. Sometimes there will be horrible food shortages across the board, other times there will heavy competition for Ore or Heritage. The point here is that you don’t know what to expect and you play the game that is in front of you not one that is theoretical and pre-planned. This change in Nations can be a bit frustrating for those coming from Through The Ages accustomed to building long term pre-planned strategies but for me personally this was a welcome addition to the game. It makes the game more dynamic with a far greater replay value.

It doesn’t stop there and this next part is where I think Nations really shines over Through The Ages. You have to figure that Nations like Through The Ages has a lot of strategic decisions you are constantly making. Over the course of many games you are going to get better and better at making those decisions, which creates a problem when playing against new players. Simply put, the first time you play you’re not going to be as good as the 2nd or 3rd time you play. So what do you do when you have 2 players who have a lot of experience, one that is a self-proclaimed master and one that has never played the game before? Nations answers this question with a mechanic that sets the level of each player, kind of a handy cap built into the game to help level the playing field. I love this addition and while you can certainly house rule such a mechanic into Through The Ages, its addition is an example of the evolution of Through The Ages design. It creates balance not just in the game itself but between the skill levels of the players.

Now anyone who has ever played Through The Ages knows that if you try to play a 3 or a 4 player game, you are settling in for a very long haul. We are talking 5+ hours minimum, far more if any of the players are new. In fact to make Through the Ages a game playable in a reasonable amount of time you really have to go two player which is a shame, since part of the fun of Civilization building is having lots of Civilizations. Nations again proves that with clever and streamlined mechanics you can create an epic experience without the epic time overhead as even with a 5 player game you aren’t likely to go over 3 hours. This is a HUGE boon for Nations, in particular that its precisely the length of time it takes to play Through The Ages that it almost never hits the table. No game in my collection has ever collected as much dust as Through The Ages does, even though everyone who has ever played the game at my house loved the experience. In fact the most common sentiment about Through The Ages is “I loved it, let’s never play it again”. More than that however Nations is a far more interactive game, there is virtually no downtime for anyone at any time. Each player takes one action, than the game moves forward. In Through The Ages a single players turn can take upwards of 10 minutes if you sprinkle in some Analysis Paralysis, so downtimes in a 3 or 4 player game can be excruciatingly long. In Nations things can move almost too fast sometimes, your constantly watching the board and anticipating your next action. It has a good flow and feels great.

The main result here is that these two games have two very different very distinct forms of re-playability. You have the dynamics of the improvement deck and the order in which they might come up in Nations, but you also have this element where you don’t know what strategies will be viable. You will have to determine that in the course of the play and even potentially change that strategy in response to what is going on, but not just game to game or round to round, but action to action as the actions of the players leading to yours can turn things upside down for you.

The result is a game that forces you to constantly re-evaluate the table, re-think, plan and execute strategies. This is a far cry from the much more predictable and stable Through The Ages and while some might actually not like this aspect of Nations because it can come off as random, it does present a game that is more opportunistic in nature. More importantly it creates a feeling of distinctively memorable ages in the course of the game as Military might be the big thing in the Antiquity age, but by the Medieval age building wonders becomes the THING to do. It’s just a more responsive experience, one that makes the game more thematic but even more importantly less predictable and more dynamic. This leads this very abstract game to feeling less abstract and more thematic.

Again Nations scores an A+ from me in the department of re-playbility, this subtle yet very important change pushes Nations into a more tactical and strategic game. To win you have to adapt your strategies for each game, each round and each action as opposed to adopting a strategy you apply to every game because it’s effective, a problem Through The Ages suffers from terribly.

Conclusion
Overall I think Nations beats Through The Ages in every single category you could use as a comparison. Its more streamlined, easier to learn, it has more strategic depth and far more varied tactical play, there is more interaction between players and that interaction is constant. There is less downtime, there is more replay ability, the game is faster and it can accommodate more players in a far shorter time.

I still think Through The Ages is a great game, very much deserving its praise and a home in your collection. I think however you will have a hard time introducing Through The Ages to a group that has played Nations. Nations is a game that feels right and brings to the forefront that same depth and harmonized Civilization building experience without all the overhead of Through The Ages and is far more thematic to boot.

In the end its about gameplay and experience. Nations is the clear winner here, because as much as I love Through The Ages epicenes, that epicenes sours a great deal when its enormity and complexity coupled with its excessive demands on your time result in a game that you love but never play. Nations fixes this problem and its designer has created a more approachable and viable game for your gaming group. Sure we could nit pick at nations and point out some of the interesting albeit complex mechanics that have been removed that are part of what gave Through The Age’s feel. I certainly understand people who notice and recognize that, but again, if no one wants to play a game in your group because it takes too long and its too complex, even if it’s a great game it doesn’t do anyone any good.

Nations is a winner, one that I think will land on my top 10 games list in the future. I give it my highest recommendation with the caveat that like Through The Ages it is still a very niche game. Its still a heavy Euro and that is something you really need to be into in order to enjoy it.

Designer: Paolo Mori

Libertalia is really a big surprise to me, it’s a game from a designer who’s games have not really hit with me in the past. I found Paolo Mori’s previous games to always come up short in the fun department even though games like Rise of Augustus and Vasco Da Gama featured interesting topics and mechanics, they were a bit of a drag. Libertalia is clearly Paolo Mori’s best game to date and has gained a fair amount of popularity and praise from some respected reviewers. I got an opportunity to finally try this little card game and while I went into it with limited expectations and a “sure let’s try it” attitude, after a single turn of the game it immediately got my attention.

In Libertalia you are a pirate captain who along with other captains (other players) has just captured and plundered a ship. Now it’s time to split up the loot and the game-play is a sort of card driven negotiation of that activity where you try to get the most amount of treasure from the plunder for yourself by playing pirate theme character cards with a wide variety of special powers.

The game-play is broken down into three days, presumably three separate ships that you capture as a group. During each day players will negotiate for treasure on that ship, broken down further into 6 turns, effectively 6 plays of cards. Each player will receive 9 identical cards from a deck of 30 cards numbered from 1 to 30. For each turn random bounty tokens are drawn for that turn of play, these bounty tokens are treasure from the plunder each with its own value, but also includes cursed treasure, treasure maps and a few specialty tokens. This is what your negotiating for. The goal of the game is to claim as many doubloons (victory points) at the end of the day as possible, the player with the most victory points at the end of 3 rounds (3 days of play) wins the game.

Claiming bounty tokens is very simple. Each player selects a card represented by a pirate themed character from his hand of 9 cards and plays it face down. When everyone has chosen a card, the cards are revealed and put in ascending order. Than starting from the player with the highest number, you take 1 treasure of your choice. Simple right!

The catch is that each of these cards are actually characters, each with unique special powers. These powers vary is strength, but in those powers lays the bulk of the strategy. The trick to the game is that powers are executed in reverse order (from lowest numbered card to highest), so while playing the highest numbered card will yield you first pick at the treasure, the lowest card numbers have their abilities triggered first. These abilities can impact characters, victory point earnings and have all manner of special effects so by the time all the powers are executed some of the characters may have been removed, players may have already scored points or taken a variety of special actions that shift things in their favor.

The game is really about trying to guess what cards other players will play and playing your cards in a manner that will benefit you and screw everyone else the most. It’s also knowing which cards to save for later, a lot of this game is about timing. You know what the nine cards everyone has (at least in the first round) so it’s really about just trying to guestimate how your opponents will approach each of the turns in a 1 day round. You can only play any card one time and that card will either be added to your Den (your play area) which coincidently can result in added effects as some cards have effects that take place from the Den or they will be removed. In either case you will only play them once (in most cases) so you must choose wisely.

Now you will only play 6 of the 9 cards in your hand and in the next round (the next day) players will get a new set of 6 identical cards. Hence by the second round of the 9 cards only 6 of those cards in the players hands are identical. This happens again in the 3rd round so things become a bit more chaotic as players not only consider what cards to play in any given turn, but what cards to save for future rounds.

There are many effects that transpire during the course of a round, characters will be eliminated, resurrected, create lasting effects, help players score points, put curses on other players (minus victory points). All of these effects are based on the cards so certainly anyone familiar with the game has a clear advantage but it doesn’t take more than one or two plays of the game to get a grip around what is possible so the game goes from “learning how to play” and “playing with strategy” for any given player after a game or two.

Libertalia is a game that is very simple to learn to play but nearly impossible to master. The complexity of the moving parts and trying to make predictions is very rewarding when you succeed and heartbreaking when you fail, but it’s not a game of guessing, it really is a mind game of prediction and reaction to what has already been played and what can be played in the future. There are a lot of surprises and “oh shit” moments in the game, it has that spark a lot of great strategy games I love have like Dirk Henn’s shogun where there is a period of quiet contemplation with a sudden burst of energy and chaos after a revelation. The more players the more chaotic and difficult it is to make predictions, but to me this really makes the game more fun. The game plays 2 to 6 players, but I think the sweet spot is 4 to 6 players.

It’s a fast, relatively short game, the box says 45 minutes and that is quite accurate and once everyone knows how to play I think it can be even faster than that. (the first game might take a little longer).

Libertalia is a game that scratches that hard core gamer in me, it’s got the depth of a very solid and thinky strategy game, but is so simple and social enough with a familiar theme (pirates) to be welcomed as a after dinner party game you can pull out with none gamers. It has energy and excitement built into that moment of revelation of the cards and I think this does wonders for the atmosphere it creates. It really has those longevity legs as well, it’s a game that gets better with repeated plays and is just short enough that in can almost be used as a filler. I was really surprised on how quickly I became enamored with it, in particular given that this designer’s games have landed so flat with me in the past. Now some might say this game is a kind of watered down Caylus, which I suppose one could make that argument but I personally never cared for Caylus so the fact that I really like this one says to me that the games are distinctively different enough.

I’m not sure one could say the game is thematic, it has a solid theme which really comes through in the art work which is nothing short of amazing, but you’re not really doing much piracy stuff. It really is just a kind of estimation, logic card game which could easily be layered with any sort of theme you like. I think choosing a pirate theme for this game was a smart idea though because pirates are kind of that universal theme that gamer or not you can get behind. Fantasy themes and science fiction themes typically don’t land well with none gamers, but pirate themes in my personal experience don’t have that “we are nerds playing a board game” social stigma.

I highly recommend Libertalia in particular for any gamers out there trying to get non-gamers into the fold. It’s a really clever yet simple game that can function really well as a gateway game, but it has the muscle and depth of a solid game for hardcore gamers. I honestly believe this to be one of the best games to be released in 2012, a solid contender for my top 10 entry level games, I’m certain if I did the list today it would find placement there. It might even breach my top 10 best games in the future, I really like it that much.

Designer: Michael Rieneck, Stefan Stadler

Pillars of the Earth is one of those games that is touted as a classic or a gateway game into the world of designer board games by many. Released in 2006 it comes from that golden age of Euro games period where a tremendous amount of modern game design comes from and while I agree the game is simple enough to be a gateway game, I find it highly unlikely I would introduce this game to brand new would be gamers, there are just far better games than this one to do that with and the theme is a bit of a hard sell. I actually didn’t play the game until it was reprinted not too long ago, In fact, you could say I largely skipped the golden age of Euro games and I’m now kind of going back and playing some of these older games like Pillars of the Earth. This gives me a unique perspective because I have played games that use mechanics that where based on some of these originals. Interestingly enough though, I find that in in some rare cases the so called classics actually play a lot more like modern (recent) releases and Pillars of the Earth is definitely one of those.

Pillars of the Earth is a uniquely designed game and one of those rare Euro games with a theme that fits the mechanics even though being architects of a cathedral in the 12th century is not exactly what I would call an exciting theme, at least it doesn’t sound like it when I describe it. I don’t want to come off sounding negative however as Pillars of the Earth is a very interesting, very well paced and very challenging game and for a Euro game, very thematic.

In Pillars of the Earth you are grand master builders (Architects) in the 12th century contributing to the building a massive construction project (a cathedral). It’s a game based on a book by Ken Follet that you have probably never read as well as a TV show that comes highly recommended and acclaimed that no one has seen. I’m not entirely sure the theme of the book or the show come through, but you certainly feel like the manager of a construction project in the game and in the end that is far more important to the theme than the actual literature it’s based on.

In this worker placement game you compete via management of a variety of resources including workers, gold and various other building resources (wood, stone etc..) on a tight game board with limited spots all in the typical Euro style battle for victory points. This is not the part of the game that makes it unique, though I would point out that from an artistic point of view the game board is nothing short of beautiful and it’s a joy to play on. What does make the game unique is that the game is pleasantly balanced, has a number of random elements (that don’t make the game random) and puts players to tough choices that go beyond simply “where to place the workers”.

In fact, even worker placement itself is two prong as you first choose where to place your “worker units” to collect resources but later you also place your master builders on spots with various beneficial effects. The master builders are put into play using a really clever mechanic of pulling random master builders out of a bag and placing them on a roundel where the player who’s master builder is pulled must decide whether he will pay in gold the fee to put the builder into play, or pass so he can place the builder later in the round for free. This combined with other tough decisions like which resource cards or builder cards you pick all combine to create really an almost overwhelming amount of choices. Each choice has to serve a purpose and be planned, but the random elements to the game like when your master builder will be pulled out of the bag for example and how much he will cost to put into play create tension and management problems you have to solve as you go. It’s quite easy to mismanage yourself or manage yourself into a corner, so while newbie friendly rules wise, the game can be quite unforgiving at times and you can see your victory slipping away from you because of a couple of bad decisions early in the game.

I suppose the issue I have with most worker placement games is that they tend to become kind of predictable, it might explain why I like Lords of Waterdeep and Kingsburg. In Lords of Waterdeep you have quest cards and secret missions on your lords cards that force you to adapt your strategies for each game while in Kingsburg your rolling dice to determine where you CAN go. The randomness in Pillars of the Earth don’t force results upon you but rather put you to tough decisions, unlike Kingsburg for example where the dice limit what you can do as a mechanic. This is the sort of randomness I really like where it can be mitigated a great deal with smart decisions.

In either case the mechanic works very well, it creates tensions, opens paths to strategies and varies each game sufficiently so that you really can’t repeat the same strategies with each play. More than that though Pillars of the Earth has a lot of sections of decisions, the choices aren’t simple and they have long term effects. Which builder and resource cards you claim in one part of the round, which resources you claim with your workers in another part of the round, when to put out your master builders and subsequently where to put them in the last part of the round all form the events of a single round that has lasting effects for this and future rounds. Than you have to deal with the event cards, worry about your limited resources like gold for example all the while trying to squeeze as many points out as you can. There are a lot of moving parts yet the games sequence is fast paced and keeps everyone involved at all times so there is virtually no downtime in the game. You’re constantly making decisions and the game rewards you for those decisions and punishes you for mistakes. The pacing feels just right, the tension is just right and while I prefer the game with 4 players, it plays fine with 3 (skip it as a two player game).

I think as far as worker placement games go the tough sell here is the rather bland theme and again, I say bland more because it sounds bland, in practice the game is actually very engaging and interesting, with a theme that really fits the mechanics and kind of settles naturally into the games flow. The hurdle is trying to explain to your friends that a game about 12th century architects building a cathedral can be exciting, strategic and fun. When I describe Lords of Waterdeep for example, I tell them that they will be noble lords of a fantasy city vying for power and control, suffice to say, it’s a much easier sell.

Pillars of the Earth is a very good game, in fact, dare I say it may actually be a better game than Lords of Waterdeep which I consider the premiere worker placement game because it’s a got considerably more depth (in particular if you compare Pillars of the Earth to Lords of Waterdeep without the corruption expansion). It’s more gamey, even if it boasts relatively simple rules depth and I find that the many strategies and approaches to the game, coupled with some of its randomness give this game a very high replay ability value. It may in the future appear on my top 10 list, I like it that much.

I would put this one into the worker placement game for people who want to take a couple steps above the pure worker placement games. Lords of Waterdeep and Kingsburg are good example of very simple and straightforward worker placement games. You put your worker down, collect resources, score points. Rinse and repeat. These games are fun for various reasons and I will happily play them both, but for me, Pillars of the Earth really brings it up a notch above the standard worker placement affair. There is more umpf to it and I really think if you like worker placement games this is one you definitely should not miss.

I highly recommend it.

Designers: Robert Dougherty, Darwin Kastle

In the last few years we have seen an ever increasing amount of deck building and deck drafting games, they are what you might call “All the rage” as far as designer board and card game mechanics go. The popularity of games like Dominion and Thunderstone is undeniable and that’s just the most notable ones, there are certainly plenty of under the radar games out there that are worth mentioning in this category. With its very low price, thumbs up from respected reviewers, high praise from board game geek and science-fiction theme it really was almost an automatic buy for me. The fact that there was a dirt cheap online app version of the game to test drive the game electronically was just icing on the cake. Let’s face it, some publishers know how to promote a game and some don’t, White Wizards Games clearly knows its audience.

Star Realms is actually a very simple game, it makes use of the deck building mechanic that most of us are already familiar with because of games like Dominion but instead of making the game about collecting points in a sort of race, it pits two players against each other in an outright “magic the gathering” like duel. No surprise, given that the two designers of this game are Magic The Gathering designer veterans.

Star Realms is effectively a combat game in which players use and purchase ships to generate gold to purchase new ships and bases and attack power to attack the health known as authority in Star Realms of their opponent. Each round you draw 5 cards from your deck, play the cards, buy cards from the pool of 5 randomly lined up in the center of the table and use whatever attack power you have to deal damage directly to your opponent. Take turns, rinse and repeat until someone runs out of health.

Now like all good card games the cards have all manner of special powers from forcing your opponent to discard cards, drawing more cards, earning you additional health and all manner of other interesting effects. The more powerful the card the more it costs. In addition each card you purchase be it a ship or a base is associated with a faction (one of four) and most of the cards have a primary effect and a secondary effect that triggers when a card of the same faction is played in the same round. For example an Imperial faction fighter has an attack power of 2 and forces your opponent to discard a card, but if another Imperial card is played that fighter deals an additional 2 points of damage.

This triggers lots of strategic options but since only 5 cards are available at a time from a deck of about one hundred, unlike Dominion, there isn’t a fixed strategy you can pre-plan and play, its very dynamic and your always making tough choices round to round. The pace of the game is very fast, you can start and finish a game in 15 to 20 minutes and it doesn’t take up a lot of space so it’s a game you can definitely travel with. This one should definitely go into the camping backpack or in the glove box on a road trip.

There are many twists and turns in this game in particular given its very basic core rules mechanic, in fact, for such a light and easy to teach game its depth is surprising. I was in particularly impressed with the games fluidity and approach-ability, it’s one of those card games you really can teach to anyone and it was very easy to get non-gamers to try it out.

Do I like it? Truth be told, I love it. I’m not sure if its the art work or the mechanics, but the game has an addictive appeal and I suppose for me personally its the same reason I like games like Dominion and Thunderstone. That deck building mechanic is fantastic and its always fun to see it applied to different types of themes. I think being largely a two player game Star Realm is of limited use for me in my collection since I so rarely only have one other player available. In fact these days even 2 to 4 player games come up short, I tend to have 5+ at my table. That said, Star Realms immediately became a permanent addition of what I like to call my “Race For The Galaxy box of space card games” which includes of course Race for the Galaxy but also other space games like the Eve Online CCG. I like card games themed in space and Star Realm certainly earns its stripes as an ideal addition. It fits that “We got 20 minutes, its just the two of us and one of us doesn’t know how to play the game” niche, which is actually contrary to what it sounds like, far more common. Its a game you can teach on the fly, its fun, its got depth, its pretty and its science-fiction. Its what I like to call a “yes” game, as its one of those games when I look to my collection for a game to pull of the shelf it answers yes to a lot of filters that are commonly used.

I’m not sure the game really needs expansions, I have talked about this before but there are a lot of games that are just great the way they are and while I’m sure the expansions are interesting and worthy additions, I don’t see the point, the game is perfect the way it is. To me personally games like Star Realm are great BECAUSE they are simple and expansions always unquestionably complicate games. A good example is Dominion, the base game is a simple to teach, fast and very uncomplicated. Throw in a couple of expansions and it becomes a very complex, very intricate game that takes waaaaay to long.

This game definitely gets the seal of approval from me, don’t hesitate if you’re a scinece-fiction nut looking to find a 2 player game that’s easy to teach but offers plethora of depth for repeated plays.

This particular little Euro released in 2010 to considerable acclaim picking awards like the 2010 Meeple’s Choice Awards, Swiss Gamers Award and International Gamers Award, just to name a few. It’s gotten considerably good support from Board Game Geek sitting pretty on the tail end of the top 20 but more importantly for me personally it came highly recommend by several friends as a really great, fast, yet deep strategic card game.

It’s a game that has been on my “must play” list for nearly five years, that’s quite a bit longer than I like to wait to review a game, but there are so many games these days and only so much time and wallet one can dedicate to gaming. In any case, I finally got to play it, so here is your review of 7 Wonders!

7 Wonders is a strategic card game about building Wonders of the World. In essence it’s a sort of drafting game where you go through 3 ages of ever improving cards constructed into decks representing each age. The cards of each deck in each age are distributed among the players and you effectively pick a card to play into your play area, than pass it to your neighbor. When all the cards have been played the age is over and you move on to the next age, there are three ages in the game. It’s a point scoring game and there are a wide variety of ways to score points, the winner of the game is of course the person who scores the most points at the end of the game. Each card represents some sort of advantageous building or effect, many of which give you access to the all-important resources and gold you need to build the wonders each player has in their player area chosen at random at the start of the game.

There are a number of pretty interesting effects and mechanics that make up the whole of the strategic play and while the pick and pass mechanic is simple, the choices you have to make are not. Simply put, whatever you don’t choose someone else can get, while simultaneously anything you play into your own play area might later help your opponents as many buildings allow players to gain advantages based on what their neighbors have constructed. It’s essentially a tug of war, you build what you need, while trying to deny your opponents what they need and avoiding building things that could help them later on. You want to get your wonder built as quickly as possible as it typically scores you points, earns you money and sometimes has some sort of beneficial game-play effect as well as freeing you up so you can focus on building other advantageous point scoring buildings.

There are other mini effects in the game, for example at the end of each age there is a battle that takes place between you and your neighbors on your right and your left of you. The winner of these battles is the player who raised the bigger military (red cards with combat strength) and you gain points for each victory in increasing values as the ages go up. There are many little “quirks” of point scoring in the game which force you to think about how the game is going on the whole for everyone, so you’re not only concerning yourself about what your building but what your opponents are building and how that compares to you and each other.  Most of the interaction between players comes in this form, which is to say, the interaction is pretty minimal.

This game reminds me a great deal of Race for the Galaxy in that, players are all doing their own thing, but you’re keeping a close eye on what your opponents are doing because their choices can open up strategic options for you. For example a player builds a building that produces wood, so you counter by building a trade building that allows you to buy that wood from them cheaply. With access to an additional wood you might be able to complete a more difficult building later on, which in turn earns you an advantage like earning points off of certain types of cards your other neighbor played. It can get pretty tricky, decisions can be tough and even a single mistake can put you at a big disadvantage. You would think with such a simple mechanic as pick a card and pass, the game would move quickly but people get hung up on tough decisions quite frequently.

I can’t say I was blown away by the game, but card games rarely ever blow me away as the mechanics of card games are often quite toned down compared to board games and 7 Wonders is no exception. I think it’s a clever game and at about 30 to 45 minutes regardless of how many players you have  it’s a pretty fast game with plenty of strategy and tough decisions to be made, all the marks of a good game. There was nothing in the game that stood out for me, either negative or positive that is worth mentioning, though I can understand it’s popularity but as I suspected (and perhaps it is the reason it took so long to get it played) it’s not really my type of game. At least it’s nothing I plan to put into my collection, though I have absolutely no objection to playing it, it’s a fine Euro.

It has quality components and it does avoid some of the designer pacing problems many such card games have, it’s clear the impact of the streamlining movement in board and card games has been used to good effect here. There was much more that could have been added to the game that would have been unnecessary, it’s focused and to the point and that’s what you want out of a solid Euro card game. In fact I found that the expansions seemed to be mostly unnecessary burdens on the game, for example the Leaders expansion added another type of deck that is used in the game and while interesting and certainly not overwhelming, It really didn’t alter the game a whole lot. It just added “one more thing”. I suppose for fans of the game this would make for a good expansion, but I didn’t really see any reason for its addition, it didn’t improve the game in any meaningful way.

It’s become common practice now to use heavy iconography in card games and 7 wonders makes good use of this approach, in fact, having mentioned Race For The Galaxy as a comparison this game had a lot of the same sort of complexities mechanically but the Iconography made it a lot easier to understand than in Race for the Galaxy, which really helped the game a great deal. It’s less of a bear to teach than Race as a result.

The art style is rather bland, in particular given the subject matter which offers a great opportunity to really embellish. I’m not entirely sure the theme came through particularly strong in the mechanics and it got little help from the art, so to me it felt more like a point scoring game with clever mechanics rather than a game about building wonders of the world. In fact the only thing that gives you the impression of “wonders” are the stock player boards with the actual wonder your building, the only place where the art rose out of acceptable into the pretty. Had they taken the opportunity to use the same attention to the art on the cards, you might have squeezed more thematic presence at least visually into the game.

I can only conclude that like many Euro games, I like it enough to not have any objection to playing it but it’s nothing I feel the urge to add to my collection. It’s certainly not as clever as Race For The Galaxy which remains one of the few Euro card games in my collection, but it certainly is a lot easier to teach and learn.