Tag Archives: Miniature Games

Getting Started with Miniature Games

I get quite a few E-mail questions and actually get involved in quite a few conversation about paint/assemble style miniatures games, especially recently with Fantasy Flight Games announcement to make Rune Wars the miniature game.  Now ordinarily while I like the conversations and have interest in the games, I avoid getting involved personally in paint/assemble games which is why I don’t have very many articles about miniatures games outside of the pre-painted stuff like X-Wing and Armada which don’t really fall fully into that paint/assemble hobby genre.  Recently however I have decided to get involved in a game called Bolt Action and so I picked up some of these old E-mail questions and thought based on some of those questions I would create a kind of guide to paint/assemble miniatures games given that I have been doing a lot of my own research in preparation for my own little venture.

Now Bolt Action won’t be my first venture into the paint/assemble hobby.  I did a stint with Warhammer Fantasy and a pretty long stint with Warhammer 40k as well as some War Machines.  Those experience have taught me a great deal mostly in what to avoid in the hobby.  So here are a few tips and tricks to getting involved in the hobby, hope you find it helpful.

Start slow and stay slow

Gamers are a very excitable bunch and we are pretty quick to whip out our credit cards with imagery in our heads of a 3000 point army with fully realized terrain in epic level war games.  I mean, believe me I get it and I have fallen victim to the hype and over excitement of out of control spending.  Here is the reality however, in particular if you are just starting out.

First and foremost, it takes many hours to assemble and paint a miniature army.  If you are just starting out looking at a box of unopened miniatures you are still many, many hours away from playing not to mention quite a ways from understanding what impact each model/unit will have, understanding the rules and impact of the rules in actual play and how that applies to the army your building.

Secondly it always takes at least two to tango so while you might have a 3,000 point army ready to rock the people you are going to play with might not.  Its quite important that you and the people you intend to play with are somewhat in sync in terms of point values, special rules, factions etc.. so that you don’t end up spending a lot of time getting models ready that you aren’t going to get a chance to use.

All mini gamers imagine grand battles on massive tables like this but it takes hundreds of hours and dollars before you get here. You will want to make sure you really love it before you embark on a big project like this.
All mini gamers imagine grand battles on massive tables like this but it takes hundreds of hours and dollars before you get here. You will want to make sure you really love it before you embark on a big project like this.

Finally you don’t even know if you are actually going to like the game you have chosen, miniature games come in all shapes and sizes.  Research is important and sufficient to decide your interest but it’s not going to help you decide the specifics of your army, units and style of play you will eventually choose. You need multiple gameplay experiences to really understand whether this is just hype or a real long term love for the hobby as well as deciding whether X or Y army is right for you.

Starting slow simply means to get enough miniatures to get a minimum game going and get that army ready.  You will realize that painting even a small army is a big commitment and those early first few games are going to help drive your decisions about the game which will likely look very different to you then what you conceive just from reading of the rules or looking at cool pictures of fully painted armies.

For example you might realize you’re not happy with the particular faction/army you have chosen, or you might realize that some of the units you thought would be awesome are underpowered or don’t fit your play style.  You might also realize that at 500 points the game is already taking 3-4 hours more than you thought and playing a 2,000 point game is just going to be too big.  Or you might realize you don’t like the actual game at all, a really tough pill to swallow after spending many hours and dollars on a game.

Not all miniature games require you to paint hundreds of miniatures. Games like Warmachine keep the model count small and may be more suitable for those of you looking to spend lots of hours focused on single miniatures.
Not all miniature games require you to paint hundreds of miniatures. Games like Warmachine keep the model count small and may be more suitable for those of you looking to spend lots of hours focused on single miniatures.

The point here is that there is absolutely no reason to rush into things.  If you found a game you’re interested in, pick up a basic set, paint some miniatures and play a few games to make sure it’s something that will really stick both for yourself and your gaming group.

You will find a lot of people online who have huge armies with no one to play with them, or people who don’t like the faction they chose after spending hundreds of hours meticulously painting them.  Don’t be that guy, it’s a miserable experience (take it from someone who has made some bad choices).  You really want to take your time here, get the experience at a nice slow and steady pace and ease your way into the hobby.  You will thank yourself later.

When I chose bolt action as a mini game I will play, I started by reading the books for the game first. This is a nice slow way to ease into your decision about a game.
When I chose bolt action as a mini game I will play, I started by reading the books for the game first. This is a nice slow way to ease into your decision about a game.

Weigh your options carefully, don’t over-commit or make rash decisions

Most miniature games will offer you a wide variety of armies or factions options, but once you have chosen one you will find that you have to make other more specific commitments when making decisions about what to buy, assemble and paint.  Everything from color schemes, to unit types or even specific types of equipment for specific unit types will be important, ultimately defining your experience.  For example in Bolt Action you have to decide whether the NCO in infantry unit will have a regular rifle or a sub-machine gun.  This is a very simple decision, but it puts to question what the goal of that unit will be in your army, what range you will place them in during battles, how that weapon will be leveraged. These decisions can get far more complex than that, but they will often impact your army’s effectiveness and you will usually have to make them before you ever actually get an opportunity to put them on the table.

In bolt action what weapon you give your HQ choice is a permenant part of a model. If you choose a sword and realize later you wished he had a sub-machine gun you will have to buy/assemble/paint a new model. So making sure you know what the benefits and drawbacks to that choice are is important and will have impact on your options during the games you play.
In bolt action what weapon you give your HQ choice is a permanent part of a model. If you choose a sword and realize later you wished he had a sub-machine gun you will have to buy/assemble/paint a new model. So making sure you know what the benefits and drawbacks to that choice are is important and will have impact on your options during the games you play.

It can be tough to make these decisions and it’s why you really want to build your army from the smallest point count possible with the most general and simplest decisions made first.  If you are unsure which tank to take or which giant robot is best, don’t decide at all, make the decisions you are certain about instead.  For example in most games every faction has a sort of staple, base unit type be it some sort of infantry unit or something along those lines.  Start with those.  They aren’t as fancy and awesome as putting up a monster model on the table but they usually require less knowledge of the game and have fewer options to weigh, so do those first.  Play with them, gain experience in the game and from there you will find making the more difficult decisions easier.

Metaphorically speaking, don't try to re-create a 5,000 point battle of Hoth on your first game. By the time your done prepping the game will be in its next edition. Start small and work your way up to magical moments like this. When your experienced, you will enjoy them a lot more.
Metaphorically speaking, don’t try to re-create a 5,000 point battle of Hoth on your first game. By the time your done prepping the game will be in its next edition. Start small and work your way up to magical moments like this. When your experienced, you will enjoy them a lot more.

In Bolt Action for example if you choose Japan (which I have) as your faction you have a choice of 20+ different tanks from light fast ones to big heavy ones and everything in between.  Each has different effects, abilities, options and costs, it’s a fairly complex choice to make in particular if you have no idea how effective tanks are in general or what their impact will be in the game (from experience).  I Avoid that decision and will try to play a few games without a tank to see if I can come to terms with how the game works and what impact the tank will have in my army.  This is a very specific example but you’ll find such elements in almost every miniature game.  Approach these decision with as much restraint and caution as you can muster, don’t be confident in your ability to make decisions without experience, this is the most sure fire way to end up with a painted model you will never use and regret putting time into.

Always collect with and involve your friends

Ok I can’t stress this enough but unless you have chosen a game that you already know is well established in your area with lots of eager and available opponents you really want to make sure that you are not the only one diving in.  Finding a few friends who are ready to commit to collecting/painting and playing a miniature game with you is absolutely vital.  I would say at least 50% of the people I know that play miniature games can’t find opponents to play with and their miniatures collect dust on their shelves.  It’s a very frustrating experience and you are going to want to avoid it at all cost.  There is no sense in you spending hundreds of dollars and hours collecting and painting miniatures if you don’t have a solid gaming group that is as committed as you are to the game.

More importantly though is that you should not have to twist arms, beg, plead and convince people that they should start collecting with you.  The miniature game hobby is a really big time and money commitment; it’s something you really have to want to do on your own, something that you are excited about.  It should not be something you get into because your friends nagged you into it and rightfully you shouldn’t get others to join you on those terms.

Having a shelf full of un-painted miniatures is a solvable problem, having a shelf full of miniatures with no one to play with is miserable. Find some friends BEFORE you start collecting massive armies.
Having a shelf full of un-painted miniatures is a solvable problem, having a shelf full of miniatures with no one to play with is miserable. Find some friends BEFORE you start collecting massive armies.

Also be wary of committing to a game even if there is a local scene.  Miniature gamers can be a finicky bunch, as well miniature game interest can rise and fall dramatically and you might find even though there is a lot of people playing your game, they aren’t interested in playing with random people they don’t know.  Having a few friends diving in with you is a sure fire way to make sure you have opponents.  I would be wary of going into it with the assumption that you will find opponents later when your army is done.  That usually doesn’t work out so well in particular if the miniature game you chose is obscure and less known/common.

Don’t get into the miniature paint/assemble hobby for competitive play.

I think a lot of people would argue against this advice but I would caution anyone entering the hobby with the intent or sole purpose to do it for competitive reasons.

Competitive miniature gaming is an entirely different hobby then casual/theme/fun miniature gaming.  There are quite a few drawbacks to competitive miniature gaming, in particular if you are new to the hobby.

First and foremost playing competitively will usually increase the cost of the hobby to you, I would personally say by a pretty significant amount.  Miniature games are in constant flux, in particular the bigger more well-known ones like Warhammer for example.  To stay competitive you will constantly have to pick up the latest and greatest, often forced to switch armies entirely.   I would highly recommend you talk to competitive players and ask them about their experiences in your local area, most will probably tell you a similar tale,  that staying competitive is not cheap and requires a much higher commitment to collecting then you will need to make with a more casual approach.

Playing in a public space full of noise with complete strangers is impersonal enough, but doing so with people who want to beat you at all cost reduces the experience to a point where you have to wonder why anyone bothers. Finding a good tournament scene for any miniature game is not easy.
Playing in a public space full of noise with complete strangers is impersonal enough, but doing so with people who want to beat you at all cost reduces the experience to a point where you have to wonder why anyone bothers. Finding a good tournament scene for any miniature game is not easy.

Secondly and I think this is really important to understand about miniature games, as a genre; miniature games live on the premise of playing for experience, theme and fun.  They are a kind of step child of role-playing games and really have more in common with the dynamic, abstracted nature of RPG’s then they do with the strict, organized nature of board games.   To get to the point, they make very poor competitive games and the competitive scene for every miniature game that I’m aware of can be described at absolute best to be ugly and petty.

This really stems from the lack of clarity of the rules and the general “eye ball” approach of many of mechanics of miniature games.  Things like line of site, measurements for distance, terrain and many other elements are typically rules that require a level of judgement call and while in competitive play you usually have “judges” that can settle arguments, if you try to abide by the strict letter of the rules in miniature games get ready to have some whopper arguments with people.  Every rule in every miniature game I have ever played is up for interpretation and you will find an ample amount of interpreters ready to volunteer their time and energy to arguing about it with you in the competitive scene of miniature games.  It’s exhausting; definitely not something you want to get involved in if you are just entering the hobby and it might not be worth your time to ever get involved.  You certainly don’t want to enter the frey with the intention of assembling and painting miniatures with the sole purpose of entering competitive play.  If you are going to do it, ease into is slowly and be sure to talk to competition players and ask them about their experiences.  I assure you they will have plenty of horror stories to tell.

From personal experience the best approach is to enter the hobby using advice 1, 2 and 3 outlined above and if competition interests you after that, by all means give it a go.  But absolutely under no circumstance or logic should you start collecting/assembling and painting miniatures for the purpose of competing, I assure you, it will not be a good experience.  Competitive play is something you evolve into once you have exhaustively played the game and know the rules inside and out.

Now I will say that competitive play can be a lot of fun and certainly I wouldn’t discourage an experienced veteran from giving it a go but as a new player you should actively avoid it in my humble experience.

It’s a two part hobby and that’s ok.

I will say this up front that at least half of the people I know that collect and paint miniatures do it for the painting and collecting, playing the game is an afterthought and that is ok.  This is a creative hobby and if you are getting into it because you love the miniatures and have a creative need to paint you can safely ignore the above advice, pick miniatures you like based on aesthetics and have fun.  Plenty of people make army lists for aesthetics and theme, I always love playing against them but the truth is that usually don’t do that well and this is where that approach can kind of back fire a bit.

If you are going to play the game with a desire to put a couple wins under your belt, buying units/models for an army willy-nilly from a creative angle is probably going to result in you having a pretty crappy army for gameplay purposes.  I guess the point here is that, in every miniature game, every faction will have a certain amount of model/units that just suck ass for gameplay purposes.  They might be pretty or thematic, they might be fun to play, but they will be useless to you in a game.

Painting a 28mm mini to perfection will get you plenty of praise, 30 seconds after that you will be playing a 3-4 hour game, be sure you know how to.
Painting a 28mm mini to perfection will get you plenty of praise, 30 seconds after that you will be playing a 3-4 hour game, be sure you know how to.

It’s not that much fun to lose all the time, even if your not that competitive and while I will be the first to admit that I rather lose with a pretty army then win with a cheesy one, I think there is a fine line between a crappy list put together for aesthetics and a cheesy competition list created for the sole purpose of winning.  You will sometimes need to paint models you don’t like that much because they are good for your army and exclude beautiful ones because they are shit in your list if you want to make something resembling a decent list.  These decisions you will have to make for yourself but know that there are tradeoffs either way.  Think of your opponents a bit here, its really not that fun to play against someone who offers no competition for you.  Sure it can be fun once or twice, but if you are crushing someone every time you play you would get bored too.

My suggestion is that before you buy/paint/assemble a model, be sure it’s something you are going to use or make peace with the fact that your adding it for your shelf to look nice rather than the impact on the table.

Now this is just advice and I will be the first to admit that I don’t always take it myself.  I will often find a unit/model in my army that I think looks great but is useless for the game and use it anyway.  I’m not terribly competitive and neither are my friends but I’m usually selective about it.  You really want to put some thought into the competitive angle of your army even if you’re the creative type and just want to play for fun. Its kind of good etiquette to show up with a list that puts up a challenge.

It’s a two part hobby but it’s not ok

Ok so devil’s advocate time.  Some people get into the hobby but they don’t want to paint, they don’t have a creative bone in their body and they just want to play the game.  It may be ok for that person but most hobbyists will agree that playing a game with your meticulously painted miniatures on a beautifully orchestrated battlefield only to find your opponent with hastily assembled unpainted miniatures is neither fun or in the spirit of the game.  If you don’t want to paint miniatures and intend to use greys you will find it difficult to maintain the interest of your opponents.  In fact many gaming groups have house rules against that sort of thing and in competitive play it’s usually not allowed at all.

Miniature war games are about the visual spectacle, don't be that guy that shows up with greys, it sucks the joy right out of the room.
Miniature war games are about the visual spectacle, don’t be that guy that shows up with greys, it sucks the joy right out of the room.

There are a couple of reasons for that and it’s not that tough to deduce.  This is a visual game, it’s about the spectacle of it all and people put a lot of hard work into making it so.  It’s also not really meant to be a cut throat competitive game and it’s not about rushing through the game but enjoying the experience, the ambiance of it all.  You can think of it like golf, people could play golf on any open field and get the same level of competition but they build golf courses to be exotic and beautiful because the ambiance is just part of the game experience.  It’s the same with miniatures game and coming to the table with a bunch of greys with no intention of ever painting them lacks etiquette and is a bit impolite to your opponent.

Suffice to say if you’re not interested in painting miniatures, you may want to consider alternatives like pre-painted miniature games or just tactical board games that simulate to a degree the themes and genre of miniature war gaming.  There are plenty of them, in fact I talk about them all the time on this site.

Don’t go overboard on supplies

Most hobbyist will eventually collect a massive armada of supplies, but the market is largely geared towards selling to new players and you will find that there is an immense amount of gear you could potentially buy for assembly and painting of miniatures.  90% of it you won’t need now or ever, in fact for most games 4 or 5 different paint colors, some primer and a couple of brushes with a few household tools you probably already have at home is enough to paint entire armies of miniatures.  The 100 colors and 30 brush set or other large box sets are without question crazy overkill.  In particular paints, if you buy one of these large sets the large majority will dry out long before you ever get a chance to use them, it’s really just a waste of money that would be better used to expand your army.

Unless you are some sort of artist or professional painter you just don't need this sort of thing. The reality is that most armies can be painted with 5 r 6 pots and a couple of brushes. Save your money for miniatures.
Unless you are some sort of artist or professional painter you just don’t need this sort of thing. The reality is that most armies can be painted with 5 r 6 pots and a couple of brushes. Save your money for miniatures.

On the flip side quality equipment is a good idea, in fact it’s far better to buy 5 high quality paints then it is to buy 30 cheap ones.  As far as paints go you really want to decide on your color schemes, plan out how you are going to paint your miniatures and just buy the paints you need.  Don’t try to “get everything you might need”, again because in most cases these will get destroyed before you ever get a chance to use them.

When it comes to painting miniatures less is more anyway and while certainly the depth of artistic endeavor’s vary from player to player if your just starting out its usually recommended you keep it simple and develop your technique to the point where you will know what sort of gear you actually need/lack in what your trying to create.  Trying to anticipate that when you’re first starting is pretty much impossible so you really want to keep things simple and cheap until you know what you’re doing.

Don’t try to be a master, learn to do it faster.

Aside from rhyming, this is good advice for newbies and veterans alike. The goal here is to get a painted army to the table and you’re not going to be able to do that effectively if you spend 100 hours on a single model getting everything perfect.  Not to discourage talented painters from their commitment but in as a whole once the miniatures get on the table the difference between a 5 minute speed paint and a meticulously master painted miniature is completely indistinguishable and largely irrelevant.   Miniatures are small and you’re looking at them during play from 2-3 feet away, you’re just not going to see those details.  What you will notice is the awkwardness of a grey army with a couple of painted miniatures mixed in.

This is a professionally painted army that took hundreds of hours to paint. From this distance you really can't tell.
This is a professionally painted army that took hundreds of hours to paint. From this distance you really can’t tell.

The thing about painting miniatures too is that details can always be added later so your speed paints can be touched up to look perfect in the future, but its typically far better to get the job done and have a functioning painted army on the table for your games then it is to spend hundreds of hours per miniature and find yourself constantly playing with an unpainted army.

Remember that it’s a game of theme and experience, not a competitive board game

An important lesson already previously mentioned and one most miniature gamers will fail to learn but miniature gaming is a game of estimation, a lot of dice rolling and judgement calls.  It’s a simulation of battles but one so abstracted and distanced from reality as well as distanced from mechanical stability that it barely qualifies for the term “game”.  It’s really more like you are “playing” then “gaming”.   Most gamers coming into the hobby will find it a stark contrast to board gaming, in fact, miniature gaming is far closer to the dynamic/abstraction of role-playing games then it is to the rule strict and well defined boundaries of board games.  As such it requires a lot of hand waving cutesy and imagination inspired “overlooking” of the reality and often even the rules.

You will see rules like “line of sight” to be particularly fuzzy, much of the games rules are driven by these sorts of mutual judgement calls rather than strict observance so you really need to get into that spirit.  The goal of a good miniature game is to tell a fun story of a battle, win or lose, the experience should be the reason you come back not for competitive play.

 

I already mentioned that competitive play should be avoided by most, but it’s not because I have something against tournaments but because tournaments zero in on the weakest element of miniature gaming, the rules.  With such vagueness, trying to have a good competitive experience is more likely to lead to arguments about interpretations of the rules then it is to a fun experience and as such this advice is more about approach.  Approach it as a game of storytelling like a role-playing game and you will find the entire experience far more enjoyable, do the opposite and you will quickly become frustrated with the rules.  In fact the most common information you will find online about miniature games is people endlessly arguing about rules, pointing out the weaknesses of them and more often than not accusing the game of being unbalanced in one way or the other.  I’m here to tell you that it’s all true, miniature games are horrifically unbalanced (all of them), rules are always inadequate and you will always find things that simply make no sense at all.  It’s like that because miniatures games by their dynamic nature aren’t particularly well suited for strict observance of rules.  They are games of estimation.  Understand that, make peace with it and you will enjoy the experience a lot more.

Get out when you stop having fun

It’s really hard when you spend hundreds of dollars and hours on a game and discover you are just not enjoying it.  There is a kind of mental push that “you should play”, after so much money and time was spent.  The reality is that miniature gaming is not for everyone and lots of people get into it and stay in it for all the wrong reason.  This is why starting and going slow is advice #1.

Miniature gaming is a hobby, something you really have to truly love to make enjoyable for yourself and the people you play with.  It requires a lot of patience and in particular an extreme amount of etiquette and cutesy to have an enjoyable experience.  In fact, you could say it’s a gentlemen’s game if you can overlook the sexist term.  What I mean is that it’s meant to be played with the greatest amount of respect and politeness for your opponent you can muster.

If you find yourself bitter about the rules and balance of the game, miniature games are probably not for you.  It’s just the reality and nature of miniature games that they are not an exact science or even anything approaching it.  I have seen miniature gamers get so frustrated and angry at the table over rules interpretations, accidental bumps or judgement disputes they are ready to get into fights over it and you really have to stand back, look at that spectacle and realize that not everyone is able to handle these sorts of games and that’s ok.

Don’t be that person; if you find yourself getting angry at a miniature table, you’re doing it wrong.

General Advice About Miniature Games

There is some good advice up here I have gathered from both experience and conversations with countless Mini war gamers. Suffice to say there are quite a few things to keep in mind when getting into the hobby but I think above all else the most important part to keep in mind when diving in is that it’s a very slow paced hobby.  Things are not going to happen quickly, you are probably not going to play often and so you really have to relish the experiences and opportunities you get.  Make the most of it by being well prepared, have a painted army and terrain and really make it the visual spectacle it deserves to be.

You will find that most happy miniature gamers will eventually settle in this mellow space and its a pure joy to play with them.  Those that don’t typically either washout out of frustration or worse stick around to make everyone around them miserable.  As such finding a good group with the right mindset and approach to the game is absolutely vital.  Your opponents will ultimately make it a wonderful experience or an awful experience so having good opponents is the key to the whole thing.

Also and this is for the creative types.  Mini gaming is a creative hobby and you are in the right place to lavishly create but don’t forget that this is still about gaming for most.  People will greatly appreciate your work but you still have to come to the table and present them with a challenge and create a great experience for your opponents.  I saw often see very talented painters who put so much effort into creating visual magic on the table but ultimately make poor opponents because they forget to learn how to play the game well.  It’s an important part of the hobby to make yourself a worthy opponent so don’t skimp on that part.

Finally and perhaps most important never forget that any form of gaming is about having fun, about being relaxed.  This is a pass time, people who play these games are doing it on their days off, they are looking to wash away the problems of life and enjoy a moment made entirely for them.  Don’t ruin it by being a dick.  Be respectful to your opponent and remember that the game is about enjoying it, not about winning or losing.

Star Wars X-Wing: By Fantasy Flight Games 2012

Designers: Steven Kimball, James Kniffen, Corey Konieczka, Jason Little, Brady Sadler, Adam Sadler

Final Score: christmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_star (3 out 5 Stars)

I have been playing and collecting Star Wars X-Wing since release and have always been a big fan, yet oddly enough I always felt an aversion to reviewing it. I think in part it’s because I know that while I love the game, staying objective was going to be difficult, but also because I knew that ultimately my rating system would keep me honest and in the end X-Wing wasn’t going to score as high as I would want it to. Still I have played X-Wing so long, I know it inside and out, from every angle, in every style of play. I think I’m as ready to review it as I will ever be.

Keep in mind this review is not of the core set, it’s the entire combined experience of everything X-wing from start to finish up to this point (roughly wave 8). Ok so here we go.

Overview

Unless you have been living under a metaphorical gaming rock, you know what Star Wars X-Wing is. Exploding on the miniatures gaming scene, X-Wing rose to be one of the bestselling and most popular miniatures game on the market surpassing the reigning king, Warhammer 40k. Leveraging one of the most popularized and fanatic induced franchises at a time of its rebirth, X-Wing puts players behind the cockpit of Star Wars most famous star fighters in pitched dog fights. The game packs hidden movement with clever template mechanics, a wide variety of special powers and a unique execution phase that creates dynamic and interesting combinations on level with complex CCG deck building.

You could go out on the street anywhere on planet earth and most people will know what this ship is, the popularity of Star Wars is undeniable.
You could go out on the street anywhere on planet earth and most people will know what this ship is, the popularity of Star Wars is undeniable.

It’s popularity is neither surprising nor is its economic success, but when you get right down to it, is X-wing a good game or does it live by its franchise fame and it’s fanatic fane base?

Components

Verdict: christmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_star
Tilt: christmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_star

Pros:  The miniatures look fantastic on the table with sturdy components all around, inspiring the theme and setting you up for an imagination induced Star Wars nerdgasm without worry that you’ll break something when you get too excited.

Cons: While the miniature casts and pre-paints are good, they are considerably below the quality level of your average un-assembled and unpainted miniatures game.  They are on the low end of the spectrum in the hobby.

When it comes to miniatures games, components are probably more critical than any other type of game. In fact, the miniature game hobby is referred to as a hobby because you normally spend 95% of the time assembling and painting miniatures and about 5% of your time actually playing.

Fantasy Flight being clever business folk flipped things on its heel and decided that assembling & painting wasn’t going to be a part of X-Wing and produced a pre-painted miniatures game instead. Some loved it, some hated it, but there is no denying that if you played Warhammer 40k for 10 years and you played X-Wing for one year you will have played 10 times more X-Wing matches then you will Warhammer 40k matches and it’s in part because painting is pulled out of the equation.

If only X-Wing miniatures looked this good, but I'm afraid the commercial art and the reality do not match.
We have seen a improvements over time in X-Wing, the latest releases are pretty fantastic even under close inspection, if only it started out this good.

Now the drawback here is that pre-painted miniature quality is never going to be up to snuff compared to hand painted miniatures unless you are particularly bad at painting minis. That is the case here, while the miniature paint jobs are passable, perhaps even “pretty good” this is largely thanks to the fact that most Star Wars ships are effectively variations on the color grey or beige. It’s not going to blow you away and under close inspection it’s easy to see that very little attention was given. Thanks to the rustic color scheme of Star Wars ships however, the imperfections are easy to ignore, the ships look pretty fantastic on the table and evidence of that can be seen in the fact that re-paints are quite rare in the hobby.

The casts also fall in the pretty good category but there really is little to complain about here unless you are accustomed to incredible detail of modern miniatures games. The minis are detailed enough to be recognizable and sufficiently accurate if you’re a fan.  They are scaled well enough to keep all but the most rabid fuck-tard pleased. They are sturdy as well, my miniatures have lasted through endless box shakes, drops and careless handling with little more than an occasional bent antenna. There is little to complain or praise about Star Wars X-Wing miniatures, they get the job done.  When it comes to the quality of miniatures FFG produces while 40k fans will be quick to point out (and be correct) they don’t compare to what you get from Games Workshop, considering they are pointing the finger from second place, it’s clear that while component quality is important, having a great game mechanic is what puts you in the number one spot in the 21st century.

I personally love the fact that the game is pre painted, in fact if X-wing was not pre-painted I seriously doubt I would be playing it. I have neither the time or the patience for painting these days, so for me, pre-painted minis were really a big decision maker.

Theme

Verdict: christmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_star
Tilt: christmas_starchristmas_star

Pros:  From the classic to the epic, in X-Wing the theme pours out of every exposed thermal exhaust port.

Cons:  If you don’t like Star Wars go fuck yourself.  That’s really all I have to say about that.

In a word, pitch perfect. If there is anything X-Wing got right it’s the feel of a thematic Star Wars infused dog fight. You start each match with a small, controlled and well formed group of fighters and by the time you reach your enemy it’s a cluster fuck of ships, jockeying for position, trying to get on someone’s tail and blowing them out of the sky…. eh space-sky. Success is based largely on movement, special skills of the pilots and abilities of ships as well as a bit of luck. Each ship brings something unique to the battle and every ship functions as you might imagine based on Star Wars lore.

Star Wars is an epic series of movies, and playing X-Wing will give you that same nostalgic feeling.
Star Wars is an epic series of movies, and playing X-Wing will give you that same nostalgic feeling.

This is hardly the end of the thematic presence of X-Wing. Take any dog fight scene in the movies, cartoons, books, comic books or video games and easily re-create it in X-Wing. Whether it’s battles between the Millennium Falcon and a bunch of Tie Fighters or made up dog fights like contest between Red Squadron and Black Squadron, it can all be done and the rush and thematic presence is there. Thanks to the introduction of Epic play, you can now also throw in huge ships like the Raider or Corvette to add exactly what Epic play suggests, bigger battles with more ships.

Every card and piece of gear is meticulously illustrated with a distinct Star Wars feel giving the already visual presence of the game even more appeal and this is important because you want to have a sense of a person behind the ship.

Suffice to say the theme here is in bulk and there is no disputing X-Wing’s success in this department. If there is anything to complain about here is that at 100 points in a standard match, typically the battlefield is not quite as full as one might hope. While you can throw in a bunch of low cost Tie Fighters to give it some girth, typical 100 point match ups allow you to put between 2 to 4 ships on the table. Since this is the competitive standard, it is the most common type of game people aspire to but personally I think the game is a lot more interesting at the 150-300 point mark. In particular when you are trying re-create thematic battles with authentic squadrons, it can be quite difficult to accomplish at the low point match of 100 point. This of course I wouldn’t count against the theme, after all, how many points you and a friend decide to play with is up to you and while 100 points is a standard, it’s not a requirement.

Gameplay

Verdict: christmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_star
Tilt: christmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_star

Pros:  Between the brilliant flight system, hidden movement, challenging list building and multitude of ways to play the game all wrapped in a Star Wars theme as a fan it’s simply pure joy.

Cons:  As if to counter each good point in the game FFG has poured sour milk into it through a steady and painful release of poorly thought out and unbalanced ships, pilots and/or equipment.

Ok so this is the big one and the one I have been dreading. I knew X-Wing would pass components and theme with flying colors, it is FFG and it Star Wars after all. That said in order for this review to be truly objective, despite my personal tastes, I would have to deal with the many negatives of X-Wing. Gameplay is the single most important thing to the game. Sure theme and components are critical but all the pizazz in the world isn’t going to make you want to collect hundreds of dollars in miniatures if you don’t enjoy the game, especially since the painting part of the hobby is largely removed. I’m a glass is half-full kind of guy so let’s do the good stuff first.

X-wings flight system mechanic is nothing short of brilliant in particular considering the subject matter here, it just fits in with X-Wing dog fighting like peanut butter and jelly. It’s important to note it’s not the only game that uses the system, it can be seen in Star Trek Attack Wing and Dungeons and Dragons attack wing and while the system works exactly the same, it just doesn’t fit those games at all in my opinion. The maneuver templates while a simple concept gives X-Wing a very distinct dog fight feel, quite possibly the most important and defining aspect of the game.

Next up is the hidden move first, shoot later mechanic. Again, this is such a great yet simple way to represent a dog fight in space. You have these ships buzzing around each other trying to get into position and everything from pilot skill, ship type and equipment are accounted for while simultaneously adding that wonderful human factor of trying to read your opponents mind and predicting where he will be, what maneuvers he will take. I love the way this work and it’s just a pitch perfect touch to the games already fantastic flight system. Put together, this is one of those mechanics that you look at as a amateur game designer, realize its simplicity and wonder why the fuck you didn’t think of it!

Finally and you really have to hand it to FFG here, they have ensured that there are lots of different ways to play the same game, each more dynamic then the next. You can play pitched battles or scenarios, there are different point counts, you have epic play and team epic play. They have created mission creation system which houses thousands of player created missions. Those are just the official by rules methods, but X-Wing opens itself up to the creative fans and as you might expect from a miniatures community lots of alternative rules, campaign modes, even cooperative play have all been invented for the game. The mechanic is simple enough to manage that creating balanced sub-system is a snap to do with and really everything kind of clicks in terms of trying to work the games core into alternative concepts. You buy these miniatures and you don’t just by one game, but an entire series of games all within the confines of a dog fighting epic. It’s fantastic and by and large it’s this over anything else that I love about the game.

The Flight System is simple, elegant and thematic. It's a perfect fit for X-Wing.
The Flight System is simple, elegant and thematic. It’s a perfect fit for X-Wing.

Overall I can also say that X-Wing is just fun to play and I think fun factor while a matter of personal taste exclusively should never be ignored, especially if you’re a Star Wars fan. Pushing around miniature versions of childhood toys in a game clearly made for grownups is its own magic.

Ok so now it’s time for the bad stuff and unfortunately there is quite a bit of it, it really does pain me to say.

For one the games “balance” leaves a lot to be desired, in particular in the 100 point standard match arena, the most common type of match up. Worst yet in a lot of ways many of the things released for X-Wing over the years have kind of broken its thematic spirit as a dog fighting game which really adds salt to the unbalance wound.

While we got 360 shooting on the Millennium Falcon in the early days for example, this very expensive, large ship while pretty strong, against the big scheme of the game had sufficient drawbacks that special builds were not needed to counter it. 360 shooting however became something of a common practice in releases afterwards, more and more ways to do it were released with every wave and at this point it’s just kind of turned at least the competitive game into less a dog fighting game and more a Yahtzee dice challenge. Can you roll well on command? Now I will say that unbalances of this kind can be overcome by high level play and to that X-Wing can be said to be an easy game to learn but a hard game to master. Once mastered I think unbalances become less of an issue, but that pull towards 360 shooting is strong if you’re having trouble winning.

360 degree shooting is hardly the only issue, but it’s sort of the catalyst to how releases where handled because each new wave is effectively trying to correct the problems and imbalances of the previous release, or we are meant to believe anyway. Most dominant Meta lists however in competitive play are based around 360 degree shooting or ridiculous dice control/manipulation, so you either had to just get in range to roll dice or you could forgo maneuvering and just joust without fear thanks to amazing dice odds.

Ship A was too strong, ship B was created to counter ship A, leading to ship B becoming too strong so equipment C was created to counter ship B but it accidently made ship D too strong. Etc.. etc. If you know anything about collectable card games you might be familiar with this phenomenon and you probably also know it’s no accident that the newest stuff is always center stage of the new meta. These implementations are not a result of bad design but actually an intentional way to push collection element of the game for competitive players. Another words if you want to compete, you needed to buy the new stuff because it’s always better than the old stuff. X-wing suffers horribly as a result and in large part competitive play will typically render 90% of your collection useless at any given moment and you’ll be flying variations of the 2-4 actively competitive lists if you have a desire to actually be able to compete.

Now a lot of people might argue with that assessment, believe me, I want to as well but I fully understand fanboyism, suffer from it too but it would be dishonest to assess the game any other way. This upping of the power curve is blatant. There was a time in the early days when rolling 4 dice was a lot and you would only sometimes land such opportunities, but in today’s environment, this is just average and there are ships that will roll 5 or 6 dice with re-rolls and dice manipulations thanks to combinations of ships and cards.

I love X-Wing, so it’s hard to put that to paper, but it’s true. At the end of the day X-Wing is not a balanced game. It swings wildly, there are heavily overpowered ships, ship abilities and equipment combo’s and while something new will always come along that will trump the current “cheese”, in the end the standard 100 point match of competitive play is really a disappointing experience of predictable metas. You end up facing these cheesy lists and the only way you can compete is to build your own cheese.

Epic play might take a bit longer to resolve, but X-Wing really flexes it's muscle as a game at this level.
Epic play might take a bit longer to resolve, but X-Wing really flexes it’s muscle as a game at this level.

Yes sure, if you’re a really good X-wing player you will win more often than lose and I get that and it really is true, but that really isn’t the point. The point is that you should be able to build an interesting or fun list and still be competitive within the scope of a balanced game because you play well, but in X-Wing you just can’t do that. You have to play the meta lists to stay competative AND you have to be great at the game, simply being great is not enough. I don’t mind the latter, but I absolutely hate meta play and I think it’s a flaw to design a game that hinges on it so heavily.

Now thankfully this does not mean the game has to be unbalanced. Get a friendly group together, break away from the 100 point standard, play scenario’s, epic play, re-create battles from movies or books, create a couple of house rules and you’re golden. There is fun gameplay in there and you can really avoid these broken elements of the game, but if you play X-Wing long enough you will find this ugly competitive nature of the game rear its ugly head and deflate your enjoyment of the game even among friendly groups. The unbalance is inbred into the game.

Thankfully I can honestly say that at least as of this writing X-Wing is in the best shape it’s been a long time. Many of the problems with overpowered elements of the game have strong and varied counters. A lot of gear for older ships was introduced that will make a lot more of your collection viable, even competitively. Still there are many elements that still are not that great. Ordinance equipment like missiles and torpedoes are still extremely weak despite repeated attempts to correct it. X-Wings, the most iconic ship in the Star Wars universe are universally accepted as being utterly useless and overpriced point wise. 360 degree shooting and Turrets you will still find in an overwhelming amount of lists and there is still gear in the game that will just make you hate the game as a whole as it frustrates the shit out of you in how unfair it is, both when you face it and the fact that you have to use it for your ship to remain viable. I hate having 100+ cards in my box but only 10 or so that are worth a shit competitively.

The game has aged now, whether it’s done well or not is a topic of debate, one which would make little difference in a review. The good news is that FFG still releases fun and interesting content pretty regularly and the unbalancing elements at this point are probably not repairable anyway so it’s pointless to argue about anyway. As gaming group you might consider house ruling certain things to create more enjoyable games but personally I find that the attempt are balancing and re-balancing the game via new releases is geared towards standard 100 point matches and when you break away from that, many things that are not viable become so as a result. This is kind of a good thing and I highly recommend getting away from 100 point games.

As it stands, X-Wing is a sort of wild swinger, it boasts some of the coolest and creative mechanics in any game I have ever played, while simultaneously suffering from some of the dumbest “cheesy” additions that just chip away at that wonderful design and the joy of playing a dog fighting game in the Star Wars Universe.

Replay ability and Longevity

Verdict: christmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_star
Tilt: christmas_starchristmas_starchristmas_star

Pros:  Various game modes, plethora of ships, variants via list builds and the default dynamic nature of the game result in a game in which no two matches will ever be alike.

Cons: Much of what I just said in the pro’s section really relies on you building a sizable collection from which to work and that can get expensive real quick like.

When it comes to most miniatures games replaybaility is usually not a problem and X-Wing is no different. I do believe however that you have to keep collecting and bringing in new units and gear to keep the game fresh and interesting and in that regard like most collectible games, replayability hinges a bit on expanding your collection.

There are tons of ways to build every ship, but there are also plenty of staples. Even if you use the same list every time you play however there is a ton of replayability.
There are tons of ways to build every ship, but there are also plenty of staples. Even if you use the same list every time you play however there is a ton of replayability.

In general though once your collection reaches a certain size and in particular if you collect more than one faction, you really have a game that you will never run out of new experiences to offer. Every game of X-Wing is unique, every match up will dramatically alter the outcome and different point values have a huge impact on the way games play out. The higher you go the more interesting things get and more importantly the more gear and ships you might ordinarily ignore in the 100 point frame become viable.

X-Wing gets an A+ from me as far as longevity goes as well, I have been playing this game steady since release and I’m as excited to play it today as I was the day it was released.

Conclusion

You might think that I have a love hate relationship with X-Wing and perhaps to a degree it’s true. I do love its ingenuity, its fantastic dynamic simplicity and most of all it’s fun factor. In the same breath it’s swingy with many unbalanced elements and there is far too much “useless” equipment, ships and pilot types that make your collection feel unused, in particular in competitive 100 point standard matches.

So why is it still my favorite game? In the end I think the bad parts of X-Wing can be worked around pretty easily with some creative alternative ways to play the game outside of the 100 point standard match. What you’re left is all the good with little to none of the bad. Sure it’s a bit swingy of a game and luck plays its part either way, but I think there is an element of thematic correctness to that, dog fights are wildly unpredictable and so I’m pretty ok with that.

My personal experiences with X-Wing range from good to amazing and while I understand from a competitive stand point there is plenty to complain about, the idea that competitive is some sort of requirement or standard is silly, it’s simply not. If your looking for a thematic Star Wars dog fighting game and want to re-live some of the most epic moments in Star Wars, X-Wing will let you do that with ease.

If however you are looking for a competitive game, I think there are much better miniatures games for that. Star Wars Armada comes to mind in particular if you insist on the Star Wars theme, but X-Wing doesn’t fair that well in that department in my humble opinion. It’s much better as a thematic game of creating fun scenarios, thematic and epic sized games. That’s were all the joy of playing X-Wing really lives.

For what it’s worth, my heart bleeds to see my beloved X-Wing get a 3 out of 5 stars, if I wasn’t bound by my own rating system and stupid requirement to be objective I would have given it at least 4.5 Stars.  It is my favorite game of all time and I love it, flaws and all.

Star Wars Armada: What Makes It Tick Part II

In my last article I kicked things off by looking at the Nebulon B and sort of doing a thorough assessment of a single ship. Now part of the reason I did this is because, in as a whole I feel in order to become a good Armada player you really need to look deeply under the hood of every ship, every upgrade, every mechanic etc. in the game. Hopefully that article presented a sufficiently thorough investigation into one ship that might trigger readers to look at others with the same vigor.

My next article in the series I attribute to the relentless ass whooping’s I have received since I started player Armada. Despite all the frustration, confusion and failed attempts at becoming a good Armada player what I have found is that from failure comes the greatest gains. In today’s article we are going to look at some of those lessons. Some of it will be very specific, some very theoretical but for me its all-golden lessons learned through the very gratifying art of utter failure.

Don’t forget to assess your opponents list

This really is one of the most common reasons why I have lost games. I get to the table, excited, full of energy, I just want to get those ships on the table and start the epic strategy I have contrived after days of staring and thinking about my own list. In the end however no matter how you analyze your own list, the reality is that you are not going to win because of your list, you are going to lose because of your opponents.

When facing a commander like Screed you are going to have to adjust your thinking, failing to do so will put you at a huge disadvantage.
When facing a commander like Screed you are going to have to adjust your thinking, failing to do so will put you at a huge disadvantage.

Knowing what your opponents list strategy is, what his individual ships can do, what combo’s and synergy he has and how that affects your list is absolutely vital to know long before you start setting down ships. You have to take the time to look, asses, think and adapt to your opponents list. This tip alone as seemingly obvious as it is, is actually almost never done. Even in tournaments it’s rare for my opponent to even ask me what I have, let alone actually come around the table and take a moment to look. Doing this improves your chances of winning dramatically, don’t ever forget!

Accept the Meta, Embrace The Imbalance

Meta’s always form, whether it’s the general competitive tournament meta, your local game shop or group meta or just casual games between you and your one friend. You have to adapt to the formation of metas and simply accept that in most cases meta’s are formed out of imbalanced elements of the game or more typically perceived imbalances. Players are going to try to find the best, most effective ways to win matches and the foundation of that is always going to be based on select elements of the game due to their efficiency and impact. In a sense this creates exclusion of many components of the game, while creating a sort of automatic selection of others. Not always a terribly fun approach to a game, but ignoring it is really is shooting yourself in the foot. Besides, meta’s change over time and it’s in this constant adjustment where the best players thrive, to be one, so must you.

Is he OP? I don't know, What we do know is that a lot of people are running him and he is part of the meta, so adjust accordingly.
Is he OP? I don’t know, What we do know is that a lot of people are running him and he is part of the meta, so adjust accordingly.

It’s more than just understanding the meta though, its actively building lists and preparing yourself to respond to it. It’s really easy to throw your hands up in the air and proclaim something OP, but the purity and joy of overcoming a challenge by cleverly built lists and executed strategies is a feeling like no other. Challenge yourself to unravel the puzzles the meta presents and find solutions to overcoming it. Not only will you become a superior player but you are going to distinguish yourself because very few people get too far beyond filing complaints on the forums where their tears are collected by better players. If you must bitch, do so among the company of better players who if you are lucky will pat you on the back, offer advice and inspire you to try again.

Squads are vital, Don’t Ignore them

While I think there will always be effective ways to build all sorts of interesting and unique lists that exclude fighter squadrons, I believe they are really a core element of the Armada mechanic at this point. The game is really centered around the assumption that you will have fighters and the way fighter squadrons affect the game is in essence a sort of secondary battle which when resolved will allow the victor to push through to the heart of the main battle quickly turning the tide. In every match of Star Wars Armada I have ever played, in the end, when I asses the game I always come to the same conclusion. Fighter squadrons Impact and contribution is as vital as any capital ship. I have never played a game where squadrons didn’t play a key role in the victory of a game or the minimizing of a loss. Ignore them at your own peril but if you take any wisdom from this article, know that squadrons are like an insurance policy. You might not always need them, but not having them when you do is usually quite devastating.

The secondary battle of any match is the squadron battle, if you don't bring squadrons you don't get to participate. Its like an early Christmas gift to your opponent.
The secondary battle of any match is the squadron battle, if you don’t bring squadrons you don’t get to participate. Its like an early Christmas gift to your opponent.

 

It’s a game of maneuvering, not dice

Oh this is so hard to admit and so difficult to accept, especially for an unlucky bastard like me. It never fails that you pick up a handful of dice, watching the look on your opponent as he awaits his inevitable fate only to find heart ache on the table. The dice gods are cruel and we curse them for their insolence.

Yes, dice do matter but if you end a match and blame the dice for your loss you will never, ever, be a good Armada player. Oh it’s hard, I know, believe me, if anyone has a complaint to file with the dice gods it’s me. In the end however no matter how you analyze, no matter how much you calculate and how much time you spend in church praying, its maneuvering not dice that will lead you to victory.

Dice stats do matter, but if you are basing your strategy on it, your gambling.
Dice stats do matter, but if you are basing your strategy on it, your gambling.

This is first and foremost a game of maneuvering and it’s a rare match indeed that you can’t trace back to tactical maneuvering errors. Sure builds are important, global strategies are important and certainly if you are just rolling blanks things aren’t going to go well. Maneuvering however is the great equalizer, it’s how you deny your opponent opportunities and create them for yourself. There is no better method to improve your game than learning to control the plastic on the table. Getting those ships into their arches, managing ranges, precision timing and the ability to think a turn or two ahead are all priceless skills.

More than that though as you learn to maneuver and become efficient at being exactly where you want to be, it opens doorways to new builds, to understanding advantages of less common ships and equipment and above all else it allows you the luxury of creating more efficiency within your lists as you won’t have to compensate for your own errors.

No question in my mind that if you learn to do nothing else but maneuvering like a pro you WILL win games.

Don’t give up

I’m not referring to Armada in general but specifically matches that have gone badly or turned on you. I have found that in Armada it’s not over until the fat lady sings and while sometimes you can have atrocious setbacks, every new round offers an opportunity for your opponent to make a mistake and you to make a comeback.

I have seen opponents rise from the grave and I have watched my self fall from seemingly impossible heights. If you stick it out, re-asses and continue to look for opportunities you stand a solid chance of finding them and making a comeback and this isn’t just some motivational or inspirational suggestion, it’s an object fact in Star Wars Armada for mechanical reasons.

It’s difficult to explain, I will do my best here. The thing about Armada is that setbacks usually take place for one of two reasons, your opponent executes a well laid plan and it worked, or you made a mistake and gave him an opportunity that he ceased. The thing about Armada is that everything always has a drawback, regardless of how the success was given birth. There is no action you can take that won’t ultimately present consequences for taking it and at its core this is why Armada is so mechanically well balanced.

Whatever advantage a ship has in one round, will be undone because he took that action in the next and this is the part you have to see on the board to understand how you will take advantage of it and turn things around. Every ship in particular has an optimal position that they are trying to get themselves in but ultimately that position will become a liability in future rounds when it has passed. Sure that Demolisher can shoot, move and shoot which can have deadly results for you, but he has to move and that position he is in when the smoke clears, is your new advantage, cease it.

Point here is that everyone eventually has to expose their weakness but it can be hard to see through the tears of a previous disaster, you have to wipe them away and look for the opportunities that result, they are probably staring you right in the face.

Strategy and Planning around the dice

Ok so I already said the game is not about the dice so this may sound contradictory but you do in fact have to have some sort of plan on how to handle dice because they are part of the game. You have to understand the threats and opportunities on the table and those are often represented by the potential of the dice. Here is how I see them.

First and foremost the black and blue dice you have to see as guaranteed hits, meaning when you are planning your strategy just presume whatever amounts of dice are being rolled, that is how many hits you can expect out of blue and black. This is a very statistically inaccurate way to look at it, but if you walk into a match with this belief and you make decisions based on that assumption you are going to be a lot tougher to beat.

Never roll red die at medium or short range, if you do, you’re doing it wrong. Ok again, hardly a realistic assessment, or even realistically possible to do but it’s how you want to see the use of your ships that are focused on red dice. Your job is to play keep away, you want to roll red dice without getting blue or black dice thrown at you from your targets. Clearly an impossible task but again if you approach the game with this attitude you will be a lot tougher to beat.

Always work on the assumption that your opponent will roll better than you. This is my favorite piece of advice because it mentally prepares you for what the game typically feels like even though statistically it’s probably not true. Aggression can and often will be rewarded, but reliance on out rolling your opponent NEVER pays in anyway shape or form. The game is about strategy, not gambling on your ability to roll dice well and don’t trick yourself into calling it “risk”. It’s not risk if you’re praying for good results for yourself and bad results for your opponent. Again, it’s a game about maneuvering so your job is to deny your opponent opportunities first and create them for yourself second. If you create opportunities for yourself while setting up your opponent for his you aren’t creating a strategy, you are worshiping at the altar of luck. Trust me, it’s worse than scientology, it’s a path that leads nowhere.

Finally don’t build lists driven by statistical dice assumptions or explosive possibilities. For example a Salvation with Slaved Turrets and a concentrate fire lets you roll 5 dice. That’s fantastic, but if the only reason you added that ship to your list is because you might get 5 double hit results for a staggering 10 damage be prepared to be disappointed. Don’t build strategies based on rolling dice because dice will disappoint you. Build strategies on consistency, reliability or as part of a larger tactical plan. For example the Salvation might be perfect if combined to be part of a larger strategy in which the reliance is less so on the dice but on the tactical maneuverability and advantage of the Nebulon-B. Rolling 5 dice and getting 10 hits, great!!— if you get them, but if you don’t, your strategy shouldn’t suddenly fall apart as a result.

Its a great card and it can sometimes pay off, but its nothing to hang your hat on.
Its a decent card and it can sometimes pay off, but its nothing to hang your hat on.

The Golden Rule

Ok this is a bit cliché but don’t forget that it’s a game and you are there to have fun. Competitive or casual it makes no difference, if you don’t like the list your running or the strategy you have built you aren’t going to win no matter how well thought out it is if all your trying to do is just get it done so that it’s over. The best players are always the most enthusiastic ones; those that love the game and want to be there win or lose. All and all victory is sweet, but it can leave you bitter if you didn’t enjoy earning it!

I have to admit that I don’t always take my own advice but I’m never surprised to find myself losing a match, then going back and making the stark realization that if I had, I probably would have done a lot better. Still I really believe in the advice presented here, I honestly think that if you follow it you will win more often and enjoy the game a lot more.

Have a great weekend, Nerd out!

Star Wars Armada: What Makes It Tick Part I

The X-Wing what makes it tick articles have been tons of fun to write but right now in my local gaming area it’s really all about Star Wars Armada. I like to write about what I’m thinking about and playing at any given point and since this blog is really my canvas it suits me just fine to write some articles for Star Wars Armada. Now I will admit that I’m a lot less comfortable about putting out what makes it tick articles about Armada than I was about X-Wing because I’m definitely no master of Armada, not that I was in X-Wing either but it was certainly a game I played a ton more before I started writing. I have a couple of tournaments under my belt at this point none the less and while I consider myself “still learning”, there are definitely some conclusions I have come to about the game.

With this first article I’m going to tackle one of the most commonly discussed aspects of Armada for Rebel players. The one that I find myself in discussions about regularly is the value of the Nebulon B ship for the rebels. The discussion is always about effective uses for this ship in a fleet, whether or not it’s worth it point wise and how it can contribute in competitive play. In a recent tournament I participated in out of 10 lists there wasn’t a single Nebulon B other than the one I put in my list, hardly a full analysis of the current meta but it certainly says a lot about the Neb-B’s status in competitive play at least in my area. I thought I would kick off the article series by exploring this rather iconic rebel capital ship.

nebulon-b-escort-frigate nebulon-b-support-refit

The Nebulon B Problem

The Nebulon B is probably the most difficult ship to keep alive over the course of 6 rounds of any ship in the game, in particular when using the Salvation title card which needs to enter the fray to make use of its Title ability. It’s a really strange combination because it has both the best and the worst defenses of any ship in its class as well as the best and worst weaponry of any ship in its class. It also has some real vulnerability to select types of equipment that can just utterly devastate it while being ridiculously effective in select situations. It’s a real quandary, the kind of ship that can be a game changer in some situations and absolutely useless in others.

With 2 brace and 1 evade token it’s a ship that can mitigate damage extremely well under normal circumstances, better than any other in the rebel fleet without any special equipment cards. It has 3 shields when facing with its front arc which is extremely good considering its dirt cheap price. As well that front arc has real potential to do a ton of damage when combined with certain title and equipment cards, it really can out shoot far more expensive ships, in fact it’s been known to out joust victory class destroyers.

For Star Wars fans, the Nebulon-B is an iconic capital ship that draws us to it on theme alone, but how much value does it really have mechanically in the game?
For Star Wars fans, the Nebulon-B is an iconic capital ship that draws us to it on theme alone, but how much value does it really have mechanically in the game?

The problems for the Nebulon B however are its extraordinarily vulnerable side arcs and the fact that in order to leverage that defensive and offensive strength of your front arc you have to be moving towards your enemy which in turn means at some point you are going to have to pass your opponents ships and expose your vulnerable sides. From the sides the Neb-B neither shoots well or defends well. With only 1 shield on its side it goes down shockingly easy once enemy ships set their sights on them and you aren’t going to do a whole lot with 1 red and 1 blue die when shooting even with equipment boosting them. It’s in particular vulnerable to commonly used equipment like Assault Concussion Missiles and Heavy Turbolaser Turrets and let’s not forget squadrons which can melt a Neb-B with very little effort.

This drawback is extremely difficult if not impossible to manage, really in a sense if you want to leverage its firepower you have to see it almost as a suicide ship.

Or do you?

I think in large part the current presumptions about the Nebulon B are largely driven by its miss use tactically and it’s really not surprising since it really functions opposite to everything a Rebel player would learn and understand about maneuvering and tactics with the Rebel fleet. I think Imperial players might have a better understanding of a front loaded ship. It’s a ship that is used in the exact opposite way of every other ship in the rebel arsenal, but more importantly it’s a ship that has extremely specialized uses and combinations that require very special care to both pull off and survive afterwards.

More than that though a Nebulon B ultimately borders on being useless without an investment so if you’re looking at the low cost of the Nebulon B and you are tempted know that a properly fitted and used Nebulon B is going to cost you about as much as a base Assault Frigate. You are far better of taking a Corvette for pretty much any purpose over a naked Nebulon B. So this is the first lesson in the use of the Nebulon B. Never, ever… ever use him naked. Of that I’m 100% certain.

A Nebulon B is only as good as the equipment you put on it and it begins with the Title Cards. There are 3 and as such there are really only 3 versions of the Nebulon B (with some subversions based on those core versions). You have the Salvation, Yavaris and Redemption, not having a title card on a Nebulon B is a waste of points, always, no exceptions.

yavaris salvation redemption

The Versions of The Nebulon-B

There are variations on the Salvation build but typically you are looking to maximize your front arc shooting.

With the Yavaris you are effectively a support carrier, usually supporting specialized squadrons that can really make use of that double attack.

Finally the Redemption turns the Nebulon B into a mobile repair platform and support ship.

The Salvation

The standard tactic of the salvation is to arrive to the fight late shooting at already diminished fleets. By leveraging its doubling effect of the critical hits and the defensive front arc combined with two braces on the approach you have both survivability and considerable damage potential. After you strike you will be flying past the fight using its speed and maneuverability, hopefully using its rear arc and braces to escape and survive.

Putting him in a flanking position on deployment and gaining a Nav token is critical in round 1. You also want to make sure as he enters combat he does so by getting into long range and moving at speed 1 so that your approach is slow. Your primary fleet whatever it is, should already be engaged laying down fire on the enemy and softening up shields so when the Nebulon B gets into range it can attack ships that are already damaged.

Than after a round or two when you are about to clash with enemy ships and you are going to pass, you want to ensure you time it right to get a navigation command to speed up spending the nav token you held on to from round one to go from speed 1 to speed 3 in the same round, adjusting angle to ensure whatever shoots at you, shoots at your rear shields.

Finally making use of your speed 3 and double yaw you want to immediately start U turning yourself back into the fight.

With its side arc facing a Victory Class this Nebulon-B is in a lot of trouble.
With its side arc facing a Victory Class this Nebulon-B is in a lot of trouble.

Sound easy? It’s not, it’s so extremely circumstantial that odds of your Neb B making it out alive is slim to none, especially in a tournament where the Neb-B will be seen as an easy way to score points. The truth is that this first pass is likely to be your last so you have to make it count. There are however benefits to the Neb B being exposed. Someone is going to have to shoot at it and while they are shooting at the Neb B, they aren’t shooting at your other ships. 5 Hull is not that easy to chew through when a ship has two braces either so be sure that while your Neb B is getting ripped apart the rest of your ships are tearing into the enemy fleet and making good use of the redirection of firepower. That said, with certain ships and equipment, the defenses of the Nebulon B are worthless, Assault Concussion Missiles in particular will make short work of a Neb.

The real problem with the salvation as an advantage is that it’s an entirely luck driven advantage and the odds of it going off are not very good considering your investment and the almost certain loss of the ship. Statistically you have a 2 in 8 chance per die to roll a critical hit. Regardless of how many dice you roll, the odds of rolling a critical are offset by having the same odds of rolling a miss. It’s really a wash in that regard so you are really gambling here. Even with a concentrate fire and added turrets your average damage is not going to exceed 3 to 4 unless you get lucky. Not bad if the ship could survive and get more than one or two shots in a fight, but given its vulnerability you really have to question the investment on something so luck driven and ultimately fated to explode.

I don't like to get too mathy, but doesn't take more than a quick glance to realize your chances of rolling a critical are as good as a miss statistically offsetting the Salvation ability to turn Criticals into double hits with an equal chance of missing.
I don’t like to get too mathy, but doesn’t take more than a quick glance to realize your chances of rolling a critical are as good as a miss statistically offsetting the Salvation ability to turn Criticals into double hits with an equal chance of missing.

The Salvation can be a real threat if you roll well, which is true of any ship, but it has absolutely nothing else going for it beyond that and the point investment to make it a threat is about the same as buying a naked Assault Frigate. A naked Assault frigate will last longer in a fight and likely put out more damage than a fully loaded salvation.

I personally believe the Salvation version of the Nebulon-B is the weakest of the three versions for that reason. It’s entirely luck based focus and it’s really inability to help your fleet in any other way make this a gamblers ship.

While there are variations on a typical Salvation build, the most effect one would look something like this.

Nebulon –B Support Refit
Salvation
Intel Officer
Slaved Turrets or Heavy Turbolaser Turrets or XX-9 or XI7 or Turbolaser Reroute Circuits

Which turrets you use will have various effects on different types of lists. Typically you won’t know what you will be facing hence Slaved Turrets are best to simply get extra dice. The combination of Intel Officer and Heavy Turbolaser Turrets is great against the brace heavy empire putting your opponent to a really hard choice. X17’s are great to prevent redirects especially effective against Rebel Assault Frigates counting on those Advanced Projectors. XX-9’s are wonderful for dishing out critical hits, great combined with Dodona in particular if you stick to the strategy of attacking late in a fight. It’s all very good and really up to preference, regardless of which one you choose you need one on the Salivation to really stretch the effectiveness of that one or two attack rolls you are going to get with it before it likely dies.

Intel officer is a great way to make your opponent pay dearly for using defense tokens. The more hard choices your opponent has to make the more likely he is to make a critical mistake.
Intel officer is a great way to make your opponent pay dearly for using defense tokens. The harder choices your opponent has to make the more likely he is to make a critical mistake.

The point of the build is to ensure that when you maneuver into combat you are concentrating fire and rolling at least 4 dice, potentially 5 with salvation effect, intel officer effect and the effect of your laser turret which in combination can (if you’re lucky) be completely devastating especially when firing at a damaged ships. With good timing and maneuvering you will be in a position to do this two rounds back to back before you have to make that very risky pass exposing your side arc.

It’s good to point out that the Neb B can be sacrificed to cause additional damage by crashing into stuff and blocking movement if it’s lucky enough to survive added volleys in subsequent rounds. Suffice to say the suicide salvation can cause a lot of chaos and in a way this can be an effect of its own on the fight.

For me personally though the Salvation is a hard pass, its too many points dumped into a ship that is marked for death, in particular for tournament purposes where points are involved. On average it has been my experience that this ship just has far too little impact on a match to justify. I have never been lucky enough to see it cause the havoc the ability of the Title card suggests its capable of. In short, it looks good on paper, but fails in practice in my opinion.

The Armada battlefield can very quickly become completely chaotic, in an environment like that, the Nebulon-B can easily be picked off. This reality is one of the reasons why the Salvation Nebulon-B in particular is tough to survive with.
The Armada battlefield can very quickly become completely chaotic, in an environment like that, the Nebulon-B can easily be picked off. This reality is one of the reasons why the Salvation Nebulon-B in particular is tough to survive with.

The Redemption

The Redemption build is really built to frustrate your opponent. It’s basically a ship that stays completely out of the fight but has a very noticeable impact on combat results by not only supporting the rest of the fleet with heals and tokens, but also potentially coming into the fight at the end to put those front arcs to use. This makes this version of the Nebulon a lot more versatile.

The strategy is simple. Keep your redemption Nebulon-B out of the fight at a maximum range that you can maneuver from your fleet but remain in range to use your primary ability. Hang back and repair ships that are in the fight while helping to manage the battle with command tokens.

The Nebulon-B is not the only ship that can leverage projection experts, but the Redemption is particularly suited for this task.
The Nebulon-B is not the only ship that can leverage projection experts, but the Redemption is particularly suited for this task.

This strategy is exceptional with Assault Frigates, MC30’s and especially the MC80 which can be rendered nearly invisible with Redemption in range.

The Redemption Build

Nebulon B-Refit
Redemption
Leia Organa Or Raymus Antilles
Projection Experts

The Redemption effect works on you as well as other ships so while its already helping the rest of the fleet by providing 1 more engineering for everyone (because everyone should always be within range 5 of you), it also gives you a total of 4 engineering. Leia Organa is great because you will be spamming engineering tokens hence you can pass an engineering command to ships that take too much heat in the fight regardless of their command level. This allows them to fix themselves in addition to the help you’re going to pass on with Projection Experts.

Projection Experts are going to be passing 2 shields each round and you will use the remaining 2 engineering points to recover 1 shield giving you a net loss of 1 shield each time you use it. In the first round you are going to pick up an engineering token so the first time you pass 2 shields you can recover them both with an engineering command and the token. It will take several rounds to really deplete the Nebulon B and frankly it really shouldn’t need them because it should be well away from the fighting anyway.

The alternative here is to use Raymus Antilles, which effectively allows you to pass 2 shields and recover 2 shields every round. I prefer Leia because you get more overall healing to you primary fleet by passing engineering commands. The Neb-B losing a couple of shield over the course of the match is really no big deal, besides it makes for a cheaper build.

Imagine the scenario here. You have an Assault Frigate that has its side shields down and 2 damage on the hull. The redemption kicks in with an engineering command. Leia changes the assault frigates command to engineering. Redemption passes 2 shields to the Assault frigates side, then the redemption recovers 1 of its shields. Then the Assault frigate acts. It has an engineering command, with 4 engineering it removes 1 damage and shifts one of its shields to the side arc from an unexposed area. Suddenly a ship with no shields on its side and 2 damage has 3 shields and 1 damage. If you take an engineering token with the Assault Frigate early, the recovery from the initial engagement can be even better.

With 2 shields coming from redemption and 2 more that it can produce itself, the MC080 becomes an insane tank even without any defensive equipment.
With 2 shields coming from redemption and 2 more that it can produce itself, the MC080 becomes an insane tank even without any defensive equipment.

It’s extremely effective and frustrating for your opponent to watch all that damage get recovered. The redemption should really be called the demoralizer because that’s really the effect it has. This build is definitely approved, it’s easy to use, works reliability and best of all it doesn’t require to put the Nebulon-B in harm’s way.

The Yavaris

The Yavaris is a force multiplier and itself can be an amazing support ship, but requires expert skill (which I don’t have) to use. In fact, I would say avoid using her until you really get the hang of managing squadrons because to use Yavaris you have to understand how to do that well in addition to all the specialized consideration of getting her effect to really pay off. One small error in judgement with this ship and your delicately balanced build will cluster fuck into oblivion.

Yavaris should only be used with named pilots, that’s the first piece of advice. It’s an expensive toy on the board and you want to make sure whatever squads will get those double attacks will be able to maximize their impact on the field. An exception might be B-Wings.

The real trick to Yavaris is to understand that it’s a support carrier not your main carrier and in most fleets that use Yavaris, it should be a late arrival ship. You want those two or three fighters that it’s supporting to come late into a fight to shoot at ships that are already damaged to sort of finish them off. This is for two reasons.

Luke Skywalker is one good choice for Yavaris, but think about how much damage this guy can do with a double shot.
Luke Skywalker is one good choice for Yavaris, but think about how much damage this guy can do with a double shot.

First it’s because the Yavaris is still a Nebulon B, which means you have to soft side arcs and since your managing squadrons you are likely to be put in a position to expose those arcs when you commit to ensure you are in the position you need to be to manage fleets. So you want to come in late into a fight to make a less tempting target. The second reason is that typically the squadrons Yavaris supports are going to have black dice and be bombers, so you want to be throwing those dice against ships with their shields down so that when you roll a critical hit it takes rather than bouncing.

That means that you need other fighter screens and ships capable of managing those squadrons to be up front keeping your Yavaris and its precious squadrons safe. It’s all very complicated and I feel inept here, I don’t feel comfortable really advising on tactics using this ship because either the Stars have to align for this work, or you have to be a fucking maneuvering tactical ace. In fact, it’s precisely because it’s so complicated to use that I don’t use it. At least not yet.

There are variations on the build as well and it’s hard to say which is best, I suppose it comes down to price.

Nebulon-B Escort Frigate (always for the 2 squadron command)
Adar Tallon or Raymus Antilles
XX-9 Turbo Laser (optional)

You must always take the Escort for the extra squad command and the 2 Anti-Fighter attacks. This will help you to clear for your squadrons if need be and of course to allow you to manage a minimum of 2 named squadrons.

Adar Tallon is really good as it can get you a 3rd attack with one of the squadrons in later actions or the squadron phase, this can be in particularly deadly if you combo it with Luke Skywalker for example. Personally I think it’s a little too pricey just to squeeze out one more attack. Raymus Antilles is the better choice in my opinion, it allows you to pick up much needed navigation tokens, extra squad commands and if you actually do get a firing solution you get that extra re-roll. He just works well with anything really. You can also do without either for a cheaper build and I actually think that might be the best version. After all, it’s a Neb B and you will be putting it in harm’s way so it getting blown up is a real possibility, quite likely really.

The XX-9’s are optional but personally I think they are just perfect if you adhere to the rest of the strategy here. You are coming in late, you have squadrons doing double damage on your target during squad activation hopefully by the time you get to the shooting phase the shields your shooting at are going to be down. It can be a real finisher and it’s quite cheap.

Conclusion

I firmly believe that the Nebulon-B is a very difficult ship to use well, but in a sense Star Wars Armada battles are all about risk vs. reward management. There are few guarantees and anything you put on the table is going to have its drawbacks. The Nebulon-B when fitted with purpose and used to good effect, sometimes with a bit of luck can be a real game changer. It never ceases to surprise me how something as seemingly insignificant like a well-timed Engineering Token, or well-orchestrated maneuver can quite literally mean the difference between a crushing defeat and an overwhelming victory. Star Wars Armada can really swing and ships like the Nebulon-B that are well equipped can really turn the tide of a battle.

Still that said, of all the ship in the Rebel arsenal I think the Nebulon-B comes with the greatest risk of backfiring on you. It’s a very unforgiving ship, one small mistake and your toast which is why I typically use it very sparingly. It’s certainly not a ship to build your entire list around, but it’s cost effective enough to splash in there for an extra boost in very specialized areas.

I have very little confidence in luck based mechanics so of all the Neb-B builds, I think the Salvation is perhaps the riskiest but provides perhaps the greatest reward while the Redemption is undoubtedly the most reliable yet pays in moderate dividends. In a way that is the center of balance for the Nebulon-B, it really runs the spectrum of risk vs. reward. Amidst there you also have the Yavaris which I think is perhaps the most specialized and most difficult to use ship and again, I think this is a nice feature as it gives players who get deeper into the game and have more confidence an option to take on some more complex builds that use more complex tactics.

I whole heartedly disagree with the current Meta assessment that the Nebulon-B is somehow useless or doesn’t carry its value. It really offers something for every type of player, whether you like reliable low risk ships, if you’re a high risk gambler or if you are looking for a deeper tactical challenge. The Nebulon-B fits the bill for all three types of players, giving everyone something it can be used for and I think that makes it a really great ship in the Rebel fleet.

I doubt I hit on every point here with the Nebulon-B but hopefully there is sufficient information here to give my readers something new to try with the ship. Good luck in your battles and keep an eye out for future What Makes It Tick articles for Star Wars Armada.

WHAT MAKES IT TICK: STAR WARS X-WING PART VI

Seeing as the last article triggered no less than 19 E-mails with questions and comments regarding ordinance I thought I would ride the momentum and write another one addressing one of the questions most of these e-mail more or less implied. Keeping in mind I’m no master or final authority on the topic, here goes nothing.

Question
Is there any ordinance that is a notch above the rest or better in some way? Something that might not be labeled as “useless” or “not worth it”?

Answer
In my personal opinion I actually think most ordinance is quite a big notch above primary weapons. I think the thing about ordinance is that you typically have to make an ordinance list and create synergy to gain the full value of ordinance and it’s in this element costs mount and you really have to weigh lists against the alternatives. You definitely can’t simply splash ordinance into a list in most cases. You are effectively creating a list built around a strategy driven by the type of ordinance you have selected. I have also noticed that many people miss-read and miss use ordinance, often skipping over a critical element of a piece of ordinance, something I have often been guilty of myself. I think perhaps a more specific breakdown could be helpful. My point however is that I don’t actually believe ordinance is bad, though I do agree that it requires a lot of scrutiny and there are quite a few limitations and “on the fence” points where you really have to consider value vs. alternative.

 

Torpedo’s
TorpsTorpedo’s were effectively the first ordinance introduced into X-Wing in the original core set. Torpedoes typically require you to spend your target lock, so they put you in a position where you might be rolling dice without a focus token which is typically bad. It’s especially bad for one shot items that cost between 2 to 6 points. When it comes to torpedoes as ordinance you are pretty much always looking to create synergy effects to help ensure that when you shoot you get your points worth in damage caused. This is why early ships like Garven Dreis and Dutch Vander where such a great combo for using torpedoes. The question is are they worth it, well, yeah, I think they are.

dutch grave

In this synergy combo Dutch Vander target locks, which in turn gives Garven Dreis a target lock and vice versus Garven Dreis takes a focus action, so when he shoots his torpedo, spends his focus, he immediately gives it to Dutch Vander who in turn does the same thing (shoots torpedoes with focus). Effectively allowing you to Target Lock, shoot torpedos with a focus all in the same round for both ships. Both ships are 6 pilot skill which ensures you can use them interchangeably. A really great combo and example of how synergy combined with ordinance can be very effective. The problem? You have selected 50 points worth of ships around synergy designed for a single torpedo shot from each ship. Once you shoot it your left with a base X-Wing and base Y-Wing unless you dump more points into them. This is where great combos like this really lose their luster, it is a great combo but you have to question its value when compared to alternative ways to spend 50 points and the plethora of ways you can create synergy between ships.

A sound rule for creating synergy based on ordinance delivery is to ensure that the synergy continues after the ordinance has been spent.

That said I think the reputation of Ordinance being “not worth it” stems from Torpedos specifically because of the core mechanical problem with them. You must spend your target lock and they are one shot effects. Aside from the one shot thing unless you target lock one round and shoot the next, you will be doing it without a focus unless you find a combo like the one shown above to alleviate that issue. I agree that this is an issue with torpedoes specifically (not necessarily ordinance in general). It is valid to say that if you are going to shoot a torpedo without a focus, in most cases your better off shooting your primary weapon with a focus even if you are rolling less dice instead.

Let’s look at how some of these torpedoes can impact a match.

Proton Torpedoes for example allow you change 1 of your focus into a crit. While the crit is nice, when you roll 3 red dice with a focus using your primary weapon your odds are not really much improved by rolling 4 dice without one. This is typical of shooting ordinance without a focus. That said however you do flip one focus to a crit and most importantly you can shoot at range 3 without your opponent getting an extra agility with 4 dice. That is the benefit here and it’s a pretty big one because in the opening round of a match you will be at range 3 in almost all cases for at least one round on the approach. A couple of even moderate Proton Torpedo hits against an opposing fleet in the early stages of a match may be all you need to soften up your opponent and domino yourself into a victory. I do think it’s a bit pricey at 4 points, but If you use Proton Torpedoes make sure that by round 2 they have all been fired at range 3. This is there secret, 4 dice, range 3 no agility bonus for targets. If you do it with a focus, you are practically assured of some successful hits.

Advanced Proton Torpedoes are probably the trickiest if not most difficult ordinance to use in the game next to bombs, but they can be made to effectively guarantee 5 hits. You have to be at range one, you have to spend your target lock and the only benefit of its special effect is to flip blanks into focuses (3 of them), which, If you don’t have a focus makes the special ability useless. Now you do roll 5 dice which can be devastating. The assumption here is that you target lock on the approach and focus on the round you have someone in your sights at range one. With a focus you are 100% guaranteed 3 hits and extremely likely to get all 5. It’s not always an easy task to get into range one and get someone in your arc, especially for ships that can fire torpedoes since they tend to be less maneuverable and far easier to arch dodge. At 6 points it’s among the most expensive gear cards in the game as well.

Again this comes down to combos and building synergy is all about reducing or eliminating the core problem created by the base gear in the case of Advanced Torpedoes especially. In this case its arc dodging, easily solved by Nera Dantels for example who doesn’t cares about arcs when shooting ordinance. Another fine ship for shooting short range torpedoes is Major Rhymer, same cost, he increases your range to a 1 to 2 making it much easier in particular for the dial friendly Tie-Bomber. Just a couple of combination in which this little piece of ordinance can be used to greater effect.

Even with its ability to shoot in a 360 degree arc you have to question the wisdom of using a B-Wing as a ordinance delivery system, especially considering the cost.
Is it worth it?.

We are back to the question is it worth it. Well I can say without hesitation that getting a 5 point hit on an opponent for 6 points is well worth it, always, especially if you choose your targets wisely. Since both ships have torpedo slots you can use Extra Munitions to turn 12 points of gear into 8 points of gear to potentially get two 5 dice shots. Not bad at all in my opinion.

Fletchette Torpedoes are also an interesting piece of gear because it’s so cheap and because its effect is guaranteed. Many people miss that there is no requirement to successfully hit to cause stress with Fletchette torpedoes, you simply need to fire it, so it guarantees that a ship with 4 hull or less will receive a stress as a result regardless if you get additional damage. If timed right this can be devastating and really Fletchette torpedoes are a reactive piece of equipment and one of the few that you can splash thanks to its low 2 point cost. You use it when the time is right, when giving your opponent a stress can cause critical problems. In X-Wing such opportunities happen quite frequently, in fact, it’s kind of a rare case when having a stress doesn’t cause you problems. For 2 points it’s a dirt cheap piece of gear to drop on rebel fleets in particular who have some many ships capable of firing torpedoes. I believe it to be one of the most cost effective torpedoes in the game when you understand how to leverage the impact a single unexpected stress can have on an opponent.

Now that’s not all of the torpedoes and perhaps I will do more articles talking about them in the future but suffice to say the reputation for ordinance being useless even when measured against Torpedoes is debatable at best. Missiles on the other hand, their reputation as useless is not deserved at all in my opinion. I will concede that missiles, like torpedoes require synergy and often very specific list building combos to be effective but missiles can be used to devastating effect and it doesn’t take much to make it so.

Missiles
The thing about missiles in my opinion is that almost every specific missile has a specific ship and in some cases, pilot that it’s really fantastic with. For the rest they may be so so or just plain bad, but that’s really the case with any equipment card. That might explain the reputation again here of ordinance being not worth it, but put the right missiles on the right ship and you can produce combos that are crazy game changers.

Cluster Missiles. The fact that you get to shoot twice in one round is already a substantial advantage to this equipment which I think is pretty good for almost every missile capable ship that mounts it. Cluster missiles however are fantastic on the Tie Bomber for several reasons.

Part of the reason is cost. 2 Cluster missiles with 1 extra munition on a low end (Scimitar Squadron) Tie-Bomber means that your Tie Bomber can potentially shoot 8 times in 4 rounds for a combined total price of 26 points. That is dirt cheap! Now grant it you have the “spend target lock” issue but there are a number of ways to address that from Squad Leader, Howlrunner or simply upgrading one of the ships to a Captain Jonas.

Proton Rockets. God I love the proton rockets. First and foremost you don’t need to target lock nor do you spend your target lock when using them which means when you shoot them you always shoot with at least a re-roll. Now there core ability is to increase their firepower when placed on high agility ships making it capable of getting it up to 5 dice. 5 dice if you can combo it to get a focus is … devastating even if you shoot it only once. Where do you put it?

The maneuverable and flexible A-Wings are the obvious and best choice, it goes without saying. It in particular works with an Airen Cracken with squad leader (great way to support ordinance ships in general). Perhaps less obvious is putting it on a Z-95. Sure you’re only up to 4 dice, but a bandit with proton rockets is 15 points. For all the complaints that ordinance is too expensive, that is dirt cheap and you can easily fit 4 Z’s in this fashion for 60 points and still have 40 points to play with.

On the Imperial side you really don’t have a good spot for them at the moment unfortunately. There is the Tie-Defender, which is already a bit too pricey in my opinion to mount missiles on it. The Tie-Advanced could do it, but it has the same issue as the defender, its already a bit pricey as is.

Tie Bombers can be fitted with them cheaply enough, but getting a Tie-Bomber into range 1 and in arc requires some doing and you may as well spend the extra points on a more powerful range one weapon if you are going to try it. In general though there is other ordinance that is fantastic for the Tie-Bomber for the same price.

The final one I will talk about is Homing Missiles. For 5 points you have a 2-3 range ordinance with 4 dice that does not require you to spend a target lock and prevents the use of evade tokens. This is a fantastic missile that works on almost every ship. One of the toughest things to do is to get a bead on high agility ships with evade and homing missiles are a great response. When you shoot a homing missile at range 3 you deny your opponent the bonus agility on top of everything.

Homing missiles have some really great synergy ships that they work particularly well on. Take for example the Z-95 combo of Airen Cracken with squad leader and 2 bandit pilots. You target lock with all 3 ships, then shoot with Airen Cracken in turn giving the other 2 ships 1 focus token each. Now you are shooting 3 Homing missiles, 1 with a target lock you can spend for re-rolls and the other 2 with focus and target lock re-rolls. That 12 dice with a high probability of hits and if you do this at range 3 you are not only denying evade tokens but the bonus for range to agility.

Grant it this is a 60 point combo but these ships continue to have great synergy after their ordinance is fired which is one of the rules you want to govern your ordinance/ship synergy selection.

Is it worth it. Well its debatable whether spending 60 points on Z-95’s is worth it, but if you get the hits early on this combo can really domino a match.

In conclusion. Well it’s hard to come to a conclusion. Ordinance is very expensive and being a one shot weapon requiring synergy to be effective even as a one shot weapon makes this the always questionable choice. There are a lot of great combo’s and lists one can build, it becomes tough to justify ordinance but in the same token I hope I have shown that its hardly “useless” as its often implied to be. There is a lot of potential to create complete havoc against your opponents with ordinance so unless you are an ultra-hardcore competitive player they are certainly viable. In competitive play I still agree with the general consensus that ordinance has yet to find a place in the meta, but in the same token the competitive meta excludes a great deal of things in X-Wing, excluding far more than it includes. To measure ordinance against competitive play is not really reasonable in your house games and it’s in house games the majority of X-Wing games take place.

I hope you found this article helpful and keep those questions coming, I’m always happy to have some fodder for more articles.